Skip to main content

Intuition vs. the Intellectual

  Albert Einstein and David Hilbert each chased the theory of General Relativity on their own paths. Einstein leaned on physical intuition and imaginative thought experiments, whereas Hilbert dove into precise mathematics and sophisticated geometry. In the end, Einstein arrived at the complete theory first, and Hilbert graciously acknowledged it.

But this isn't a story about physics—it's about the way we think. Whether you're a banking CEO, a CPA, or running a manufacturing company, you've mastered your field. You grasp all the technical and analytical nuances of your work. So, when pondering an event that impacts your business, you don't pull out textbooks for a deep dive. Instead, you rely on your intuition to guide you. That's because you've absorbed all that knowledge so thoroughly that it's woven into your mindset, emerging naturally as intuition.

The same held true for Einstein, Hilbert, and even Henri Poincaré, who also tackled General Relativity. They had internalized geometry to such a degree that it became an instinctive/ intuitive part of their thought process.

Don't dismiss intuition. This isn't the reckless "cowboy" variety with wild guesses thrown out in hopes they'll stick.


David Hilbert and Albert Einstein


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

THE ORIGINS OF IMPOSSIBLE PROBLEMS

The Origins of Impossible Problems Introduction. Impossible problems have always been a part of the landscape of human thought. They arise from various sources, often rooted in cognitive, logical, or structural limitations. Some problems are truly unsolvable due to fundamental constraints, while others only appear impossible because of human limitations in understanding, reasoning, or approach. In many situations, we make difficult problems impossible because of our limitations, psychological and otherwise. It is a curious thought problem to consider what sort of limitations AI will reveal when we give it truly difficult problems to solve. We must hope that we humans have not transferred our complete reliance and dependence to machine-learning tools beforehand. Below are key sources of seemingly impossible problems, along with examples and a few references to philosophical and scientific thought. Impossible Problems . To explore impossible problems, we must consider our systems fo...