I am not claiming machine voting fraud exists. I am only making a case for how easy it is. Let's do it by the numbers. 1. Remember Volkswagen' scam of programming their devices to show incorrect and legal emissions when in testing mode, but otherwise allowed (honest) higher gas consumption. VW was caught only by accident - you will recall. This was deep and secretive programming. 2. Is it possible that voting machines have a similar type of deep programming, but in reverse. They work perfectly in test mode; they bias votes under field conditions. There are a couple of easy alternative methods to mask the difference between test and actual modes, particularly if there is no test mode. 3. It is painfully easy, if you control the machines and software development. Moreover, it is nearly impossible to detect. Calibration has nothing to do with this. The election commissions could re-image the machines after every vote. But the scam is r...
Random thoughts and used ideas