First Blog

  What makes us believe scientific theories? At the basis of scientific theories are its axioms, and its methods. For example, you can believe in physics but not have a glimmer of the nature of gravity, (This is a problem for physicists, as well). In this sense, we all believe in our scientific theories, but not so much in the axioms that form their basis. Even many mathematicians do not understand the regularity axiom, or even infinity, for that matter, but they believe in them. The hallmark of a good scientific theory is (a) its predictability, and (b) its ability to explain new phenomena. If the theory explains new evidence, this usually sustains the theory. If not, such as with anomalies in physics many times in the past, this becomes a trigger for a new theory or a revision of the old one. In psychology, Kahneman’s Prospect Theory has gained much validation as prediction and explanation are its hallmarks as evidence builds. This is why we believe them; it is because we trust t

You hear an explanation of something almost everyday.   What do you do?   First of all, you consider it mostly on the surface of the brain.   Some new input, as it were. Then comes the decision.   You can Understand what was explained Believe what was explained Accept what was explained. These three key words, understand, believe, and accept comprise a gross summary. But they typify three principles by which the brain or mind holds explanations. There are variations, exceptions, and exclusions. Just one is important now, and that is you may take the explanation as an example of several others in your mind, none of which have any of the attributes.   It sort of sits there awaiting further processing. Before getting to the picayune details, note that understand, believe, and accept are mostly exclusive, meaning one does not imply the other.   For example, you may accept global warming into the future, but neither understand nor believe it.   Similarly, you ma