First Blog

This is a conspiracy theory about large-scale terrorist attacks.  Beware of such theories as they are mostly plausibility arguments gleaned from a sequence of events.  So, be suspicious and critical.  We do our theory by the numbers. 1.  First of all, it seems the big terrorist organizations such as ISIS can strike at will really wherever and whenever they so choose.  They have “soldiers” willing to give their lives in the cause of terror.  These are not occasional, random attacks, but well planned logistically and technically.  They could strike somewhere in the world frequently, perhaps even weekly, but do not.  Why? 2. These organizations also have a strong survival instinct.  They know that weekly attacks will result in the overwhelming response even from the most globalist of countries to strike back, annihilating their bases, their funding, and their very organizations.    3. So, they face an optimization problem, which is to survive while creating a recurrent sense

Terrorist attack in Berlin.   It seems the perpetrator of the truck attac k at a Christmas market in Berlin left in the truck not only his immigration papers (to be deported) but also his wallet.   I’m a simple guy that would never leave my wallet in any place but my pocket.   Most guys are like this, as women leave documents in he r purse.   One basic conclusion is that our rather stupid perpetrator, Anis Amri, is deeply dead and concealed probably at the hands of his own group, with his documents used to deflect investigations from the trail.   Amri has a perfect profile for exploitation. Note, terrorists place little value on life, even their own. If what I’ve said makes sense, it signals a new approach to terrorism, one in which there is a serious and very secret core group willing to carry out terrorist acts, and moreover willing to sacrifice any and all toward that end.   The war of terrorists becomes ever more dangerous.   Their motto may be: to use the mass refugee pr