Skip to main content

The Ultimate Inequality of Transhumanism

The old adage, "Money isn't everything," is about to be profoundly redefined. Soon, financial wealth, houses, yachts, and private jets may truly pale in comparison to the coming benefits of advanced technology. The ultimate commodity will not be currency or capital, but eternal existence.


The Immortality Protocol.

Leaders in the field of AI and robotics, such as Elon Musk, suggest that the future of consciousness lies in synthesis with machines. Musk projects that within two decades, we could achieve the ability to upload human minds into humanoid robotic forms. Through advancements in neurotechnology like Neuralink, a person’s memories, personality, and core thought patterns could be captured and digitally preserved. Combined with a fresh, resilient robotic host, such as a Tesla Optimus, the individual could achieve virtual permanent power and continue their existence almost infinitely.


The promise is immense: whole-body replacement, unlimited memory capacity, and a complete escape from biological decay.



The Ultimate Divide.

This prospect of digital immortality, however, will not be universally available. These technologies, already in planning stages (such as organ-replacement bio-engineering), will be prohibitively expensive and politically controlled.

The dawn of this era threatens to create the most profound and permanent social division in human history. A new elite, defined by those who can afford or attain political access to eternal life, will emerge. The average citizen, the Everyman, will be left behind, doomed to live, serve the immortal elite, and ultimately die as mere biological beings in a world fundamentally divided between the post-human and the mortal. The future's true hierarchy will be based not on wealth, but on whether or not you are permitted to live forever.

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more