Skip to main content

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned.

I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man. 

Fast forward to 2014.

Parallels between the poor Munch and (the not so poor) Cliven Bundy, a rancher in Nevada seem clear, though details are somewhat askew.  Bundy is accused of not paying grazing fees and removing his cattle from government range as ordered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).  Moreover, his claims for redress have been rejected three times in the courts.  (Munch would have lost as well.)  Yet, the courts are agents of the government through statute and case law. Are they not?  Bundy claims historical precedent and common justice. This unmistakable parallel is not perfect - but close enough for a mention. 

What we see is clear.  Those still believing in the Robin Hood concept, champion of the peasants, the oppressed, and the poor clearly favor Bundy in his lone struggle with neighbors to avoid the intrusion by big government upon his ancient rights. On the flip side, those supporting authority, in this case the government, demand Bundy cease and desist, pay his grazing debts, and obey the law. At this writing, we see no Robin Hood to lead support for the rights of Bundy.  Ah, context...

The reason why the legend of Robin Hood is still a grand tale is that the poor and oppressed successfully rejected abject and insensitive authority.  It it were an everyday event, Robin would have been forgotten centuries ago.


Remarkably, even many of those in government or not believe in the Robin Hood myth just so long as it applies to their preferred issue(s).
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Lies, Deceit, and the National Agenda

The world you grew up in is no more.  The world of reasonable honesty and reasonable lies has been replaced by abject dishonesty and blatant lies. Lies.  Yes. People have always told them.  You have told them; so have I.   We need lies; they are a foundational structure of social living.  They both deceive and protect.  Children tell them to their parents to avoid consequences, like punishment.  Adults tell them to their bosses, to enhance their position and/or avoid consequences of poor performance.  Our bosses tell them to their boards to suggest business is good, the project is on target, or the detractors are wrong.  The boards tell them to shareholders to protect their own credibility and most importantly, stock values.   Our politicians tell lies to their constituents, though sometimes innocently with them not actually knowing much more than they've been told.  They enhance their positio...
2 comments
Read more

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more