Skip to main content

Machine Voter Fraud

I am not claiming machine voting fraud exists.  I am only making a case for how easy it is.  Let's do it by the numbers.
1. Remember Volkswagen' scam of programming their devices to show incorrect and legal emissions when in testing mode, but otherwise allowed (honest) higher gas consumption.  VW was caught only by accident - you will recall. This was deep and secretive programming.

2. Is it possible that voting machines have a similar type of deep programming, but in reverse.  They work perfectly in test mode; they bias votes under field conditions.  There are a couple of easy alternative methods to mask the difference between test and actual modes, particularly if there is no test mode.


3. It is painfully easy, if you control the machines and software development. Moreover, it is nearly impossible to detect.  Calibration has nothing to do with this. The election commissions could re-image the machines after every vote. But the scam is retained.  It is sort of like trying to eliminate a Trojan horse (type of  computer virus) by rebooting the computer.  It doesn't work.  My goodness, I could write such a code in FORTRAN, in C, even in Basic.

4. Certainly election officials are not equipped to detect this type of fraud.  Certifying agencies for voting machines also cannot.  New tests need to be created.  Certainly, printing paper ballots from the machine might help, but programming obviates this, as well.   Cute.

5. I am not trying to sound alarmist, but am simply conjecturing what I can conceive of. If I can, others can.  The stakes in modern elections are so high, and there has been such a decline in individual and group morality, that many operatives would not hesitate to do this - if only they knew how.  Some do!

6. Somebody ought to check this out. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more