Skip to main content

Problem-Solving – The Enemies List

Introduction. Much of life involves problem-solving of some sort. Many are routine, some take time, and others seem nearly impossible. The important fact is that we don’t solve them all, or, even worse, we offer ineffective or poor solutions. Most problem-solving books available suggest how to solve problems. In this brief essay, we discuss the barriers to solving a given problem. Here is a list of common "enemies" of problem-solving, also called the psychological, cognitive, and practical barriers that prevent us from effectively addressing and resolving them. These are drawn from psychological research and productivity insights.

The List. Every problem solver should be aware of these barriers. Team leaders should monitor closely to prevent their team from falling for any of them, particularly #6 on confirmation bias and #8 about unnecessary constraints.

1.      Lack of Knowledge or Information: Without sufficient understanding or data about the problem, it's impossible to identify viable solutions. This barrier often leads to guesswork or stalled progress, as seen in situations where key facts are missing.

2.      Too Much Knowledge (Information Overload or Curse of Knowledge): Having excessive information can overwhelm decision-making, causing paralysis, or lead to the "curse of knowledge" bias where experts assume others share their expertise, complicating communication and fresh perspectives.

3.      Overthinking (Analysis Paralysis): Excessive rumination or dissecting every detail without action creates indecision and delays, turning potential solutions into endless mental loops that amplify stress rather than resolve issues.

4.      Mental Set: A rigid reliance on past strategies or familiar approaches prevents innovative thinking, as the mind gets stuck in "what worked before" without adapting to new contexts.

5.      Functional Fixedness: Viewing objects or ideas only in their traditional roles limits creativity, such as failing to see a tool's alternative uses in a novel problem.

6.      Confirmation Bias: Seeking or interpreting information that only supports preconceived notions ignores contradictory evidence, leading to flawed or biased solutions.

7.      Irrelevant Information: Distracting details or misleading data clutter the process, making it hard to focus on core elements and wasting time on non-essential factors.

8.      Unnecessary Constraints: Self-imposed rules or assumptions (e.g., "it has to be done this way") restrict options, even when they're not required, hindering flexible thinking.

9.      Emotional Barriers: Fear of failure, anxiety, or frustration clouds judgment, causing avoidance or rushed decisions that overlook better paths.

10.   Lack of Motivation: Without drive or interest, problems are ignored or half-heartedly addressed, leading to procrastination or incomplete resolutions.

11.   Poor Problem Definition: Vague or misframed issues (e.g., tackling symptoms instead of root causes) make it impossible to target effective solutions.

12.   Lack of Resources: Insufficient time, tools, or support (e.g., financial or team-based) blocks implementation, even if a solution is identified.

13.   Cultural or Societal Barriers: Norms, biases, or groupthink in social contexts discourage unconventional ideas, stifling collaborative or individual problem-solving.

14.   Lack of Experience: Often underrated, the lack of experience leads to stunted performance in finding the optimal solution.

Conclusions. Call this a “starter list,” barely describing for each their meaning, and definitely requiring more details. For instance, there are about six independent ways of overthinking a problem. Moreover, many on the list overlap to some degree.  Future goals include making detailed descriptions.

 

© 1/1/2026 G Donald Allen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...