Skip to main content

THE WEALTH TAX – IT’S POSSIBLE – EVEN FAIR

PREAMBLE: It's fair; it's reasonable, but still, I don't like it.  

Did you know that we already have a form of wealth tax? It is called the property tax, sometimes referred to as the school tax. This tax is based on the value of your home. Typically, you pay a low, fixed rate per thousand dollars of assessed value. The calculation is simple: multiply the tax rate by the value of your property.

If you rent, you are not exempt. You pay this tax indirectly through your rent. You also pay it when you stay at a hotel or motel, and even if you live in a tent on land you own, you still pay property tax on that land.

Many people object to proposed “wealth taxes,” sometimes suggested at rates as high as 5 percent of net worth. Yet policymakers often overlook the fact that a wealth tax already exists in a familiar and politically accepted form. If structured carefully, such a tax could be expanded in a way that would generate additional revenue while limiting opposition to only the wealthiest individuals. Claims of unfairness would likely fade with little public attention.

The key is to make the tax rate proportional to property value but increasing as the value rises. In other words, the rate itself would scale upward with higher property values. This concept is best illustrated graphically. A straight line would represent the current system, where taxes increase linearly with property value. A curved line would represent a sliding-rate system, where higher-value properties are taxed at progressively higher rates.

By adjusting the curvature of this line, a county or school district could raise it to whatever revenue it needs—without provoking headline-grabbing controversy. The tax would remain firmly anchored to property values, a long-established and widely accepted measure. There would be no need for subjective or intrusive valuations of cars, artwork, or other difficult-to-assess assets. After all, this is how we all pay Federal income taxes. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...