My habit of recording thoughts began years ago, not as a structured daily commitment, but as an intermittent practice—capturing ideas as they occurred. Returning to these small notebooks months or even years later yielded an astonishing discovery: they provided a clear, documented map of my mind's evolution. They revealed precisely how my thinking operated in the past and how dramatically my perspectives had shifted, often leading to stark realizations like, "How could I have been that stupid?" or, conversely, "At least I could think way back then."
To clarify
terminology: a diary is typically a consistent, regular record of
events, feelings, and indications. My intermittent record is more akin to
a journal, defined as a less frequent account focused on events, thoughts,
or ideas. Though many professionals, particularly politicians, maintain
journals for operational or even legal purposes, my own goal was always
strictly private.
The
foremost realization from this practice is that I was unknowingly conversing
with my future self. This written past becomes essential because memory is
notoriously unreliable, being a constantly edited and changing archive. The
journal preserves the authentic, unvarnished state of mind from a specific
moment. Without this written record, one can only look into the past through
the murky lens of an ever-changing memory. You cannot imagine
how informative such a journal becomes. When reading it I sometimes wonder,
“How ever could I have been that stupid?”
Even more
so in talking to my future is my diary, where I express on a regular basis my
feelings, events, and family matters. This is even more personal (i.e. private)
than my journal, and I share it only with myself. A leather-bound, vellum-paged
volume is not needed; for years, I wrote comments in pocket, spiral-bound
notebooks. Scribbles, diagrams, and pictures are all included within these.
The Modern
Paradox of Public Articulation
This
desire to say something has exploded into the digital age with blogs and online
journals, estimated to number between 500 million and one billion worldwide.
This massive volume demonstrates a powerful, universal urge to articulate one's
thoughts. Yet, the sheer number of abandoned or near-empty sites, like the
countless blogs based on a single word and little else, presents a profound
paradox. Millions want to start a conversation, perhaps giving a good
introduction, but ultimately fail to follow through. The collective reason for
this abandonment includes a lack of time, a lack of substance, or simply not
knowing how to articulate the intended message. It has become
and remains a fascinating, unwritten chapter of digital sociology.
2025 G
Donald Allen
Comments
Post a Comment
Please Comment.