Skip to main content

How's Your Intuition? - A Survey

 A Survey on Your Problem-solving Intuition

Here are 20 Intuition-Oriented Self-Assessment Questions. Answer them with yes or no. (Please no maybe-type answers.) Below the survey is a rubric for scoring. The questions were not taken from any validated psychological test (such as the Cognitive Reflection Test, Insight Problem Solving scales, or dual-process theory inventories). They are meant as an informal self-assessment, and are not a research-backed measurement tool. They draw (very) loosely from general concepts in:

·       Insight problem solving (e.g., “Aha!” moments)

·       Dual-process theory (analytic vs. intuitive thinking)

·       Metacognition (judgments about one’s own thinking)

·       Creative cognition (fluency, flexibility, associative thinking)

You might note that your intuition is strongly related to what Kahneman calls fast thinking. (Kahneman, Daniel, 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.)

The Survey.

  1. You often get a strong hunch about how to approach a problem before analyzing it fully.
  2. You can usually sense when an idea won’t work even before you can explain why.
  3. You quickly notice patterns that others overlook.
  4. When faced with uncertainty, you’re comfortable making a decision with incomplete information.
  5. You frequently arrive at solutions suddenly, as an “aha!” feeling.
  6. You trust your initial impressions, and they usually turn out to be right.
  7. You make connections between seemingly unrelated ideas without effort.
  8. You can often tell which parts of a problem matter most right away.
  9. You prefer to visualize or imagine solutions rather than work through them step-by-step.
  10. You can sense when someone else’s reasoning has a hidden flaw, even before you pinpoint it.
  11. You often anticipate outcomes correctly before the data confirms it.
  12. You rely on gut feelings in problem-solving and they generally serve you well.
  13. You find it easy to generate multiple possible solutions quickly.
  14. You often think of unconventional approaches that others don’t consider.
  15. You can tell when you’re close to a solution, even if you can’t articulate why.
  1. You can quickly sense which information in a problem is irrelevant or distracting.
  2. You often recognize the general shape of a solution before working out the specifics.
  3. You instinctively look for simple explanations rather than complicated ones.
  4. You frequently spot shortcuts that reduce the effort needed to solve a problem.
  5. You can usually tell when you should abandon a current approach and try something different.

-----------------------------------

Here is a scoring rubric I constructed, but it is based only on my intuition.

17–20 points — Exceptional Intuitive Problem Solver - You have a very strong intuition for patterns, shortcuts, and promising solution paths. Your “sense” for problems is usually reliable, and you quickly identify what matters.

13–16 points — Strong Intuitive Problem Solver - You rely on intuition effectively.
You spot patterns quickly and often arrive at solutions without needing full analysis.

9–12 points — Balanced Intuition - You use intuition sometimes, but not consistently.
You benefit from a mix of gut feeling and structured reasoning.

5–8 points — Developing Intuition - You tend to rely more on step-by-step or analytical approaches than intuition. Your intuitive sense might need more practice or confidence-building.

0–4 points — Analytical Over Intuitive - You prefer clear rules, structure, and explicit logic.
Your intuition may feel unreliable to you, but this isn’t a weakness; it just means you excel through deliberate reasoning.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?