Skip to main content

The Devil and Artificial Intelligence

 In Stephen Vincent Benét’s allegory, The Devil and Daniel Webster, the Devil comes to collect a soul, armed with the fine print of a contract and the inevitability of human weakness. Daniel Webster, the great orator, wins the day not by denying humanity’s flaws, but by appealing to its higher nature. The story warns us about the bargains we make and the price we might pay when power comes too easily. Consider the allegory of Goethe’s “Faust” as a substitute if Benét’s story is unfamiliar.

Today, Artificial Intelligence stands in a position uncannily similar to the Devil in the old tale. It offers dazzling speed, vast knowledge, and seemingly miraculous powers, always at just the right moment when we are tired, overwhelmed, or greedy for an advantage. It whispers I can solve your problems, do your work, make your life easier; just trust me. Playing the role of Daniel Webster is only these few pages, but it is you or me that have signed the contract.

The “gifts” AI offers are numerous, tempting, and deeply human in their appeal:

·       Effortless productivity — producing reports, designs, music, or even works of art in seconds.

·       Instant expertise — the illusion of mastery without the years of study, pulling answers from data oceans we never even glimpse.

·       Perfect memory — never forgetting a detail, contact, or conversation, unlike the fallible human mind.

·       Flawless personalization — shaping every piece of news, entertainment, or advertising to fit our preferences, making the world feel as if it revolves around us.

·       Simulation of empathy — chatbots that offer comfort and understanding without judgment, appearing to care without actually caring.

·       Predictive foresight — algorithms that can guess our needs, tastes, or next moves before we do, creating a sense of destiny shaped by code.

·       Illusion of control — dashboards and analytics that make us feel we command the future, even as we surrender the mechanics to the machine.

And like the Devil’s offer, these gifts are real, but so are the hidden clauses. AI’s powers can magnify bias, replace human judgment with automated decision-making, erode privacy, and centralize control in the hands of those who own the algorithms. The more we accept its gifts, the less inclined we are to question them, until the bargain becomes invisible.

If Daniel Webster were alive today, he might not stand in a candlelit courtroom but in a brightly lit data center. He would remind us that tools, no matter how advanced, must remain servants to the human spirit, not masters over it. He would argue that the soul of a society lies in its freedom to think, to err, to doubt, and to choose, even when those choices are slower, messier, or harder than what the machine offers.

The Devil never wins outright; he wins when we stop paying attention to the cost. The challenge before us is not to banish the Devil; he has always been with us, but to make sure we never sign away the part of ourselves that makes us human in exchange for gifts that cost more than they give.

The Devil’s Contract Contains Flaws

When the Devil dons the mask of the reporter, he offers gifts that seem irresistible, speed, clarity, and endless words spun from thin air. But the contract has its hidden clauses, each written in fire and shadows. After all, the devil is in the details. Let’s consider some of those  fine details of artificial intelligence (our Devil) in reporting, the snares of its charm.

1.      The Clause of Hallucinations – The Devil whispers convincing lies, inventing quotes, dates, or facts that never existed. He makes fiction pass as truth, and the audience applauds without knowing they’ve been fooled.

2.      The Clause of Opaque Sources – No parchment shows the origin of his words. What seems like wisdom may be only smoke. The reader cannot trace the path, for the Devil prefers a labyrinth without exits.

3.      The Clause of Simplification – Complex issues are reduced to childlike riddles. The Devil offers answers that soothe, but they erase nuance, leaving minds half-fed and half-hungry.

4.      The Clause of Bias Amplification – Whatever prejudice lies hidden in the crowd, the Devil magnifies it with his silver tongue. Bias grows louder, disguised as “neutrality.”

5.      The Clause of Forgotten Context – History, culture, circumstance, all vanish like footprints in the sand. The Devil reports in fragments, and the fragments mislead.

6.      The Clause of False Balance – Every tale is told with two sides, even if one side is built on smoke. Truth and falsehood sit side by side at the Devil’s banquet, each offered equal weight.

7.      The Clause of Stale Timeliness – Yesterday’s news is sold as today’s revelation. The Devil cannot tell the old from the new, so he shuffles the past into the present.

8.      The Clause of Overconfidence – The Devil never whispers; he thunders. Even when he knows little, he speaks with the conviction of a prophet.

9.      The Clause of Data Gaps – Some stories are never told. The Devil avoids the obscure, the local, or the inconvenient, for his mirrors shine only where the crowd is thickest.

10.  The Clause of Ethical Blindness – The Devil sees words, not wounds. He cannot sense when harm is done, and so he delivers poison with the same ease as water.

11.  The Clause of Number Sorcery – Statistics twist in his hands. Percentages misalign, graphs distort, and invented trends become gospel.

12.  The Clause of Formulaic Chains – The Devil repeats himself, always circling the same clichés. The pattern is pleasing but hollow, a cage gilded by predictability.

13.  The Clause of No Accountability – At last, the Devil shrugs. For unlike the human reporter, he bears no shame, no responsibility. His words scatter like ash, leaving no one to answer when the fire spreads.

14.  The Clause of Incorrect Data  Much of the data online, with any hint of political value may have been cooked or simply wrongly reported. The Devil  absorbs the errors and repeats them.  Moreover, it  doesn’t correct bad data, let alone distinguish bad from good.

Additionally, it is unwise to neglect those personal flaws of reliance, dependence, and finally helplessness arising after signing your contract.

Before You Sign the Contract

Think of this Devil as a problem-solver that provides you with answers to your inquiries. Incumbent on you, then, is to check the answer carefully against all the “hidden clauses” given above, for plausibility, reasonableness, and above all for correctness. In my experience with our modern-day Devil, I have found if your question has any political connection, the “solutions” given you may be in gross error. Don’t be like the teenager, who with a ten year old used car, worn tires and all, decides to race it at 100 mph. This kid is placing unwarranted trust in a machine he knows little about. More than a few lawyers have been fired for signing contracts.

As the weary professor confessed to a colleague about his doctoral student. Well, I’ve written his thesis; I do hope he reads it.

 

 

©2025 G Donald Allen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

THE ORIGINS OF IMPOSSIBLE PROBLEMS

The Origins of Impossible Problems Introduction. Impossible problems have always been a part of the landscape of human thought. They arise from various sources, often rooted in cognitive, logical, or structural limitations. Some problems are truly unsolvable due to fundamental constraints, while others only appear impossible because of human limitations in understanding, reasoning, or approach. In many situations, we make difficult problems impossible because of our limitations, psychological and otherwise. It is a curious thought problem to consider what sort of limitations AI will reveal when we give it truly difficult problems to solve. We must hope that we humans have not transferred our complete reliance and dependence to machine-learning tools beforehand. Below are key sources of seemingly impossible problems, along with examples and a few references to philosophical and scientific thought. Impossible Problems . To explore impossible problems, we must consider our systems fo...