Skip to main content

IS YOUR LIFE JUSTIFIED?

The question of whether one's life is justified is a deeply personal inquiry that touches on purpose, meaning, and individual impact. So, what is it? "Justification" means in this context whether it needs external validation, a measurable contribution, or an internal sense of fulfillment. We suggest a life is justified not by grand achievements or universal approval but by the authentic pursuit of personal meaning and connection.


Every individual exists within a unique set of experiences, relationships, and choices. The justification of a life lies in how one navigates this web with intention. For some, meaning is found in creating art, ideas, or innovations that ripple outward. For others, it’s in the quiet acts of kindness, like supporting a friend, nurturing a family, or even moments of personal growth, such as overcoming adversity or learning from failure, that lend weight to a life’s purpose. For still others, it means finding a religious faith, or even finding a true purpose. These acts, big or small, affirm that existence is not a passive state but an active process of becoming. Justification cannot be a consequence of randomness.


Skeptics might argue a single life lacks significance unless it achieves extraordinary impact, dismissing the interconnectedness of human experience. Not so. A single conversation can inspire change; a small gesture can shift someone’s perspective. These, the ripple effects of our actions, often invisible, create a collective justification that transcends individual scale.


The threads that weave a justified life, no matter how ordinary or extraordinary, imply intentionality and growth, whether through love, creativity, parenting, faith, perseverance, or even in some cases, acceptance. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...