Skip to main content

Science vs Religion and the Maxim

 The Art of the Maxim 

Wisdom is often carried along through maxims, aphorisms, proverbs, and truisms. They are often stated in vague terms or in vague ways that resonate differently with different readers but carry a similar message. In this short note, we’ll consider a maxim from one of the great mathematicians and cryptographers of the 20th century, Alan Turing (1912-1954). The problem with this maxim is that without familiarity with advanced mathematics, it might not have genuine meaning to a general audience. We will look for a similar meaning through re-expression. 

So, from Turing we have,

"Science is a differential equation. Religion is a boundary condition."

Looking for some wisdom, this maxim suggests that everything (e.g. science) in the world is a contained mechanism, with science on the inside, while it is bounded from the outside by conditions we may not know. However, the inside and outside are strongly linked with the boundary conditions specifying what happens inside. Any resonance so far? Possibly not.

 


                                                             Figure 1 Alan Turing

There are many ways to express this sentiment. I have thought of two alternatives that express this sentiment in different ways more understandable to the non-scientist. They are,

“Science is the realization. Religion is the imagination.”

“Science is to know from the observable. Religion is to know from the unknown.”

In the first of these, we reference your imagination, which upon reflection is an unknown or alien part of you. It’s yours, of course, but you can’t control it. It is something like your involuntary muscles. It most certainly affects your realization. In the second, the unknown of course is the personal or other unknowns.  Both and even Touring’s make use of relatively vague terms. 

Writing maxims or aphorisms is an art form we should all learn. I wrote a blog on this some years back. They should be short and all contain vague terms or those that can readily be converted into the situation at hand. Economy of language is essential. Often they use the same word twice, once as the subject and then as the object. Some of the best can be used regardless of politics or religion. Example: “At stitch in time saves nine.” That one is well known. Here are a few more amateur efforts I cooked up.

“Justice will come in time, provided time still allows for justice.” 

“She knew she could overcome the challenge but didn’t know the challenge would overcome her.”

“Fixing the problem created more problems than the problem fixed.” 


©2024 G Donald Allen


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/...

Teaching an Ant How to Read

You have a goal; teach an ant, (sugar ant, fire ant, army ant, any one of them) how to read.   Here are some tips: 1.       First, get its attention. 2.       Show it some examples of reading sources. 3.       Read to the ant, pointing out the words as you go along. 4.       Point to specific words, pronouncing them clearly. 5.       Explain the alphabet, and discuss how words are formed.             The net result for all your careful effort is the ant doesn’t learn a thing.   The obvious reason is that it hasn’t the “brain-power” to learn reading.    Moreover, it isn’t interested even with your infinite patience. It can’t distinguish your sounds.   In short it simply can’t comprehend what you are doing.   Its brain is not wired for learning written and spoken languag...

Can a good argument be made with a bad premise?

Can a good argument be made with a bad premise? Yes. This is done all the time. Not so much in science because all the practitioners know the premises and are not easily deceived. It is a part of their training. You will find the most excellent arguments made upon bad premises* in politics, political speech, and social communication. Sometimes, bad premises are the basis of demagoguery, to incite, to pass legislation, to go to war. Sometimes, we all make great arguments to others, though with an error in the premises. Now, let’s look for a moment at the many types of bad premises. 1.      Wishful thinking, or you just hope it is so, or you think it should be so. These are deadly to the listener and the speaker. Both parties are deceived. 2.      Expressly for deception. Lawyers make their livings this way with their interpretations of the statues or perhaps what a witness has said. 3.      Vagueness is a leading cause...