Skip to main content

A New Category of Impossible Problems

 

A New Category of Impossible Problems

Consider a new category of problems, impossible because they exist without clear solutions. In some cases, there are no possible solutions. Many of these problems are deeply embedded in systems, often going unnoticed or unrecognized. Corporate or national interests can easily conceal their presence or remain unaware of them. There may come a day when systems become so vast that they must be rejected, as their failure could lead to global disaster. Here are five examples, many of which involve significant government involvement in their creation.

A. Global System Dependencies

No company should be so globally pervasive that a failure in its systems could cause a worldwide catastrophe. This is particularly true for critical systems like airline booking, television networks, and health systems. For example, a technical issue identified by global cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike in its antivirus software for Microsoft Windows devices could have had catastrophic consequences. Although engineers fixed this issue, the dependency on global software must be mitigated. This incident occurred on July 19, 2024. However, finding a solution, even with the resolve to do so, remains a significant challenge.

B. Political Control Over Technology

Similarly, no company should have its hardware reporting users' private business to a political entity. This is the concern with Huawei Technologies Co., headquartered in Shenzhen, China, which has been scrutinized for its potential to compromise user privacy for political purposes.

C. Trustworthy Inspection of Passenger Jets

No company should be allowed to sell passenger jets to airlines without thorough and trustworthy inspections by capable engineers. The issues faced by Boeing Co. with its big jets provide a widely reported example of the dangers of inadequate inspections and the potential risks to passenger safety.

D. Certifiable Medical Products

No company should be permitted to market drugs, including vaccines, without reliable and certifiable inspections by qualified medical and statistical experts. Companies like Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna, and Novavax have faced scrutiny over the safety and efficacy of their products. Additionally, the long-standing recommendation for middle-aged men to take aspirin daily to prevent heart disease has been debunked recently, highlighting the potential dangers of incorrect medical advice. This reveals a deeper problem: traditional and even modern medical prescriptions can be wrong and counterproductive.

E. Errant Governmental Mandates

The worst types of these problems arise from misguided governmental mandates made for economic, humanitarian, health, or environmental reasons based on various quasi-scientific sources. Examples include the closure of disapproved energy sources in favor of alternates, regardless of the consequences, open immigration policies, and the deployment of massive military hardware. Governments, regardless of political affiliation, often act without self-reflection or consciousness. Governments do not think.

Such examples are consequences of modern times, seemingly inevitable, natural, and unavoidable. Nevertheless, they must be addressed, or the problems will worsen. These issues will not self-solve or self-correct. Solutions will not come from amateurs in their garages. With computer codes comprising millions of lines, projects costing billions of dollars, highly complex machinery, and ordinary people making decisions they scarcely understand, these problems are immense and require expert intervention.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view