Skip to main content

Happiness is Not Easy

 

Happiness is Not Easy

If you want to be happy, be. --- Leo Tolstoy

Introduction. Whoa! Tolstoy’s counsel is not so easy in our highly conflicted world, with everyone seeking to change us or imposing changes upon us. But our present world has little to do with it. Happiness is a state, though some claim happiness is ephemeral while others suggest it can be permanent. We claim this is too simplistic.  So let’s instead look at states of happiness, not so much as an evolution, not a variable, but mostly constant and immutable.

We dismiss the usual forms of happiness, including the hedonic, social, achievement, materialistic, mindfulness, philanthropic, spiritual, health, and creative. These are specific forms from which happiness is sometimes attained. They are subsumed by the general states considered here. We dismiss as well other aspects, or subtypes of happiness including joy, contentment, hope, serenity, gratitude, satisfaction, optimism, fulfillment, amusement, bliss, and inner peace.  Yet, all can be components of the various general and persistent states of happiness considered below. A final note is that we’re not discussing moods, which all people cycle through their lives. We focus on the general states of happiness.

Five States of Happiness

Happy: You’re happy all or most of the time. Your life, relationships, job, family, etc bring constant joy to your life. Sure, there are downturns, but only temporary ones. You see brightness in your life in any or many of the forms. One may consider spirituality as happy, but it is more a responsibility seeking concordance with precepts of a higher consciousness.

Unhappy: You’re unhappy most of the time. There is something just not right; something interferes with your well-being. If only you could fix this or strife was eased, then you’d be happy. But you are not aware that even with a fix, something else appears, and the unhappiness returns. This does not preclude your continual search for happiness. In some cases, you simply want more, being always distracted or dissatisfied; in other cases, happiness is long past.

Future Happy: You’re not happy now, but you are pursuing a goal or something that you are certain will bring happiness. It could be a great job, a college degree, a publication, or maybe marriage. It can work, or not. Put this more simply in the single idea, “If only xxx, then I’d be happy. Future happiness is not unlike gambling.

Optimally happy: You are not happy as in always joyous, but you have received much from life, such as a family, a job, material comfort, love, health, and more. Still, you worry about things knowing you don’t have much to complain or be unhappy about. From this conflict, it is safe to conclude you’re as happy as you can be. This is not too bad. Once acknowledged, you find you’re quite happy. You are optimally happy.

Manic happy: You’re happy one day, unhappy the next. This persists year after year, sometimes with the happy state needing more juice to activate. Manic nappiness is cyclic, of course, but surely deteriorates one’s mental health in the long term.

Conclusions. While always being happy is theoretically preferred by most, probably optimal happiness is more common. Stoicism is a similar condition, as it reflects a certain consilience with life. Being always unhappy grinds you down, taking energy and even good health. Remarkably, once optimal happiness is accepted, it paradoxically increases happiness. Rich or poor, successful or not, free or oppressed, most folks fit here – like me. When learning a concept, it is wise to start small and build knowledge. So, beginning with these five states, you may uncover other states, better suited to yourself. For example, you could claim spiritual or social happiness are states.  Where do you fit? Socrates wisely instructed us to “Know Thyself.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...