Why are the sciences so well trusted, while other subjects are not?

More specifically, why are sciences (physics, chemistry, engineering, et al) so well-trusted while other subjects (sociology, economics, politics) tend to be less trusted?

What is asked would require a book chapter or even an entire book. What I’ll give is an answer furnished by the philosophers, but rarely applies to philosophy itself. It is the notion of Justified True Belief,* or JTB. This means you can justify your assertion (i.e. prove it based on accepted knowledge and logic), you establish it is true (thus not refutable), and you believe it. This is not quite how it is discussed in philosophy discussions. In most, one begins with the belief, then proves it’s true by some justification, which has a broad interpretation. What we have presented is how JTB works in the classroom. There we are presented with the truth (e.g. proposition), followed by its justification (e.g. proof, experiment), and finally, the student believes it. In scientific research, the process often begins with a “What if” type of question, and this leads to JTB in some but no specific order. Co-equal with JTB is the consensus of the foundations of the subject (in math called axiom) and methods of justification. For example, if a biologist justifies a truth using postmodern reasoning, it is likely given less credence than another, who uses strictly rigorous biological techniques.

Most of the sciences are built upon Justified True Belief. This gives them credibility, sustainability, and longevity. Yet, all these theories are subject to falsifiability, an event or argument that demonstrates incorrect foundations or spurious logic. All scientific theories have had “revolutions of falsification” over the centuries**. All scientists accept that current science is only temporary. This puts sciences in a permanent state of suspense. Remarkably, science as a whole accepts this, though substantial groups of scientists become wedded to their particular JTBs.

Beware of anyone who claims this science or that is closed, as in permanent and immutable. This is dead wrong.

On the other hand subjects such as politics, sociology, and economics do not have such conclusions, unless you accept what is given knowledge, agree on the structure of argumentation, and believe the conclusions. It is so, for instance, that economics pretends to be a science with rigorous arguments, but the foundation of any particular economic theory is a set of premises that less than a plurality agrees on. (BTW, there are at least 50 viable economic theories.)

Sociology and politics are similar. There is no firmament of foundations for either, each with multiple alternatives. Therefore, while you may have a justified true belief in any particular alternative, only a minority will agree. Consensus has proved impossible to achieve. Specifically, social-political-based consensus and justifications seem to have limited longevity.

This is a brief and incomplete explanation, but it furnishes a starting point to make distinctions.

*Justified true belief was once the lingua franca of new knowledge, but this has been recently demonstrated as incorrect. Check out the Gettier problem, as formulated by philosopher Edmund Gettier in 1963. More is available at https://medium.com/confusions-and-elucidations/justified-true-belief-fda233d35de1 and countless other sources.

** Well, maybe some laws such as Archimedes' Laws of The Lever and Buonancy have survived.

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I. I. Introduction. Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II. ...

The Lemming Instinct

In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

The principles we use but don't know it. 1. Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

First Blog

Search This Blog