What
Makes a Problem Difficult?
by
G. Donald Allen
Introduction. All of us solve problems daily. At home or office, from
balancing the corporate books to teaching to researching theoretical physics,
and even managing family affairs, successful days are those with problems well
solved. Many problems are routine or even easy, but too many arrive with a
measure of difficulty. So, what’s difficult?
Let’s begin by indicating that
“difficult,” when applied to problem-solving, is difficult to describe. We
explore several possibilities, for those of you already good at problem-solving.
That is, you know the general problem-solving steps (Appendix A) and have used
them to succeed previously. Certainly, experience is extremely important. Lack
of experience can make almost any problem difficult as we’ve learned from
history – our own included. Also, and of great importance is the ability to recognize
a solution if by chance you stumble upon it. Organizations of all kinds need a
“fixer,” an expert at solving problems. Here we are in the real world, well
beyond ninth-grade math class.
Interestingly the notion of “cracking
a problem,” is applied especially to solving
a difficult problem, metaphorically compared to cracking a nut.
Difficulty. Everyone everywhere needs to solve problems. People have problems, as do groups, cities, corporations, and governments. This makes the term "difficult" even more difficult to consider, much less define. We’ve identified ten categorical possibilities for what makes a problem difficult. In particular, Items 1-5 are relevant to the schools, science, and all of us generally, while items 7-9 consider humanistic factors like emotion. Items 6 and 10 are rather special for the advanced problem-solver. Note, only a few are of the math or science variety yet are included in the general schemata.
- Difficult as in others can’t solve it. Sometimes called
an open problem, it requires you need to be armed with all the
literature, expertise in the problem area, strong confidence, and most
importantly good ideas. As well, you need a period (even a moment) of
inspiration, but from where it comes can vary wildly. Such problems are certainly
outside-the-box problems.
- Difficult as in the problem may be unknowable. These
are hard to identify. After all, how can you know what is unknowable?
Perhaps solving the problem of the universe's origins is among them. Sure,
there are theories, but there is no certainty. Another big one is “What is
truth?” For millennia, this problem has had so many solutions, it has no
solution.
- Difficult as in too difficult for you. This type of
problem takes you right smack up against reality. Even expert
problem-solvers need to learn to understand when some problems are beyond
their reach. Good advice is that perhaps it is too difficult if you haven’t
solved it after two years of steady work.
- Difficult as in not your cup of tea. Even the great
Einstein could not solve simple political problems with the same ease he
created relativity. As for the rest of us, many problems are simply not within
our capacity to solve much less understand. The best problem-solvers know
what kinds of problems are simply beyond their scope. Included here are
also those problems totally new to you. Without experience or previous
knowledge, the problem automatically qualifies as difficult, if only
because you may not be equipped to consider all its ramifications.
- Difficult as in you don’t have a large enough “toolkit”
to crack it. The best approach in this case is a long and intensive study
of the problem and the problems surrounding it. This is how Andrew Wiles
cracked Fermat’s last theorem. Took seven years. On the other hand, many
simply are not willing to walk the walk, continuing to try old methods
that haven’t worked and continue not to work.
- Difficult as in “wicked.” (Appendix B) Such problems,
usually with an attached optimality and vague condition, are so complex
with so many variables that different answers pop up as you finagle the
conditions, parameters, and models. These problems are rampant in every
complex society and large corporation, and the solutions adopted are
rarely met with universal acclaim.
- Difficult as in emotional. Here the solver is often
tripped up by the very emotions needed to solve it. This can be
confounding to even the most analytical thinkers among us. Emotions love to conflict with each
other. They conflict with other difficulties, as well, as contravening
clear logical thinking. Emotion solutions are always present in popular
music with titles such as “All You Need Is Love.” Often incorrect solutions are determined
again and again. Furthermore, solutions can cycle round and round at times
coming close to a previously rejected solution. One could call these
solutions generating human fractals. Even worse, the emotional
solution may be precisely what’s needed, much to the dismay of those
emotionally challenged
- Difficult as in affected by social factors. These
include all the political, religious, political, and cultural factors,
basically summarized as “You believe this and I believe that” within
groups. As with personal factors, these could be combined with emotional
factors, but they occur in group form. Best known to all new watchers,
particularly political news, they seem to have accepted them and hope to
vote for “group” preferences. Worse, they become problems leading to
governmental transformations. Definitely related to human belief systems,
social factors create a large block of what appear to be problems of
society or humanity, in general. These would be considered by many as the
largest group of difficult problems.
Clearly, they cause multiple conflicts between and even among
religions. Nowadays, problems of religion, including taboos, pale in
comparison to other social and political problems.
For example, if all climate activism was accepted by conservatives first, climate activists today would substantially be more conservative, rather than liberal as most have become. Of late, some of these difficulties are linked with individual rights of personal action projected upon the wide social screen. On a larger scale, such problems connect with governance on the whole. Figure into this group are solutions offered because of mixed methods or mixed groups. For example, when science and politics suggest different solutions, this compounds difficulties.
- Difficult as in affected by personal factors. You are under stress, angry, stubborn
(like me), bitter, constrained, exhausted, prickly, picky, sensitive,
pedantic, rigid, or dozens of other states of mind. These truly affect the
level of difficulty for problems at hand together with resultant solutions.
These encompass emotional issues but dive deeper toward proclivities such
as time availability, a sense of security, and the normal in situ restrictions.
Summarized these through the contemporary philosophy of postpositivism,
which asserts that in many circumstances the person is involved in problem-solving
and thus the solution. Therefore, for certain types of problems, we suggest,
with trepidation, that objectivity is an illusion. Even artificial
intelligence (AI), regarded as the ultimate escape from emotion is
affected, by dint of its human programming.
- Difficult as in undecidable. This type of problem was
identified only a century ago by logician Kurt Gödel. He showed that in a
sufficiently rich system, there are propositions that can never be proved
either true or false. This discovery was to the dismay of mathematicians
and in other subjects. This takes
the unknowable to the next step of being undecidable. One could argue that
undecidable is a special form of unknowable, can occasionally it can be
proved. One humanistic consequence of this sort of problem brings up the
notion of compromise as a substitute for an undecidable situation. Problems
of religion are also undecidable, though not in a strictly rational or
universal sense. Such problems combine the unknowable, emotional, personal,
and even informational.
Further Difficulty Factors. We have excluded problems solved but with unintended
consequences. These may or may not be difficult, but rather “solution” solves
only one part of a problem but creates other problems. The difficulty here is
that the solutions are simply not thought through. Indeed, some of these errant
solutions may themselves generate truly difficult problems.
Another type of problem but not on
the list is that of random or rapid decision problems. Some issue/problem
occurs. You must respond quickly without even a moment of thought. You apply
randomly, instinctively, or even intuitively. While we all react, this sort of
problem “difficult” cannot be included in our top ten because no methodology,
rationality, or consideration can be applied. Solving on the spot is paramount.
Only later comes knowledge of an evaluation of good or bad. Experience,
processing speed, and general intelligence factor in. However, the problem may
or may not be difficult, as there is no time for analysis.
A final type, “Difficult as in vague,”
is not included in the main list because these are problems of statement, and
this leads to difficulties of interpretation more than the difficulty of
solutions. The term is anathema to well-posed problems, as they are unclear and
suggest countless authentic solutions. For example, consider the vagueness of
language, which of course is a vague instrument of communication. For example,
if tasked to find a good solution to solve the problem of drinking and driving,
the problem-solver might come up with many ideas from jail to counseling to big
fines to any of many other possibilities. The word “good” is the culprit here.
It corresponds to other terms in which some optimality is required. Wicked
problems almost always have vague components.
Conclusions. One certain takeaway from all this is for us to consider whether we have the tools to solve the problem. An old maxim is, “The poor craftsman is the first to blame the tools for a poor job.” Yet, tools are but an extension of the craftsman, in the present case knowledge and the ability for use by the problem-solver. Few problems are solved with poor tools, relying on some clever insight from nowhere. Putting this in the vernacular of the current language, one cannot think outside the box until they have well learned to think inside the box. Problem difficulty is only part of this. Some problems have their own traps tricking one toward solutions that miss the mark, just as the hammer missing the nail.
The CEO or any leader tasking their
staff to solve relevant and important problems should take note if their staff
has the right tools, and how inappropriate or wrong solutions can be offered.
The parent or spouse should consider whether they are swept away by emotion in
framing solutions. The priest should consider carefully whether the particular
scripture truly does apply. And all should know the tools to help know and then
crack difficult problems.
----------------------
Appendix A. Normal problem-solving steps.
There are countless methods to solve
problems. All problems, not just math problems, are covered. One particular
five-step list follows.
A. Identify the Problem. It is critical to have a clear
statement. Trying to solve a vaguely stated problem is doomed to failure.
B. Consider the tools of data/knowledge/literature/tests/logic/algorithms
available to solve the problem.
C. Using these tools and your experience, generate potential
solutions.
D. Choose the best solution – in the case of multiple
solutions.
E. Implement the solution you've chosen.
These sound both
simple and routine, but each step leads to its own set of problems, and each of
these may involve internally the same steps. Yes, steps within steps. For
example, even clarifying the problem can be a problem itself. Many more detailed
problem-solving lists are available online.
Appendix B. Wicked problems.
Wicked problems have always been
with us. Only recently have they been defined, clarified, and exemplified. The
word "nasty” is certainly appropriate, because what else can you say about
essentially unsolvable problems that must be solved? Some family problems,
particularly those involving teenagers, are clearly wicked. Here are a few of
the general criteria. If you want a particular real-life problem to consider as
you browse the list, think about building a beltway around a city from scratch.
a. There
is no definitive formulation of a wicked problem
b. Wicked
problems have no stopping rule. That is, you can keep solving. Eventually, an
action plan must be constructed. Only then does the solving stop.
c. Criteria
for solutions to wicked problems are not true or false, but good or bad.
d. There
is no immediate and no rigorous test of a solution to a wicked problem.
e. Every
solution to a wicked problem is a "one-shot operation." There is no
opportunity to learn by trial and error.
f. Wicked
problems do not have an exhaustively describable set of potential solutions,
nor is there a well-described set of permissible operations that may be
incorporated into the plan.
g. Wicked
problems are generally unique.
h. Every
wicked problem can be also considered a symptom of another problem.
i. The
existence of a discrepancy representing a wicked problem can be explained in
numerous ways. The choice of explanations determines the nature of the
problem's resolution.
Appendix C. Consider
this short list of current difficult problems, most of which have no true
solutions. Of course, there are
theories, beliefs, and positions on most of these, but all without consensus and few with viable
solutions as most have been with us for years if not centuries.
Survival
2.
Starvation
3.
World
peace
4.
War
5.
Misinformation
6.
Environment
7.
Food
supply
8.
Poverty
9.
Fair
Trade
10.
Reduction
of Debt
11.
Unemployment
12.
Economic
Disparity
13.
Economic
Policies
14.
Human
Relationships
15.
Communication
16.
Decreasing
Conflict
17.
Disease
and Human Suffering
18.
Education
19.
Artificial
Intelligence
20.
Cryptocurrency
21.
Cryptography
22.
Government
Surveillance
23.
Technology
24.
Energy
25.
Refugee
Crisis
26.
Resource
Depletion
27.
Human
Rights
28.
Water
Contamination
29.
Population
Growth
30.
Nuclear
families
31.
Privacy
32.
Pandemics
We do see solutions offered regularly, often in a postpositive amalgamation of politics, science, and various other beliefs. Indeed, many would have you believe that politics must be included. Nothing could be further from the truth. Mixing two problem-solving methods (e.g. politics and science) more often leads to further difficulties.
CEOs and others in business have their independent set of problems, many of the difficult variety. They vary from supply chain, transportation, dividends, cost points, advertising, assembly line, import/export, personnel, and dozens more. Make a list. You may be horrified.
We, as in us folks, also have a passel of personal problems.
Many, if not most, involve human relations, money, and health. Given below is a personal list of difficult
problems I’ve encountered over the many years. If you have fewer than half of
these, you’ve been lucky in life. There are lots of little problems. On the
other hand, you may have your own list of big ones. Perhaps a bit cynically, our politicians have
entirely similar personal problems yet are challenged to solve those on the
lists above. And we know politicians
just love talking points.
Children
2. Rebellious
teenagers
3. Cancer
4. Disease,
e.g. heart disease
5. Job
satisfaction
6. Job
search
7. Job
skills
8. Making
ends meet
9. Love
10. Hate
11. Debt
12. Household
repairs
13. Insurance
14. Dating
15. Depression
16. Friendship
17. Sleep
18. Estranged
relatives
19. Secrets
20. Forgiveness
21. Death
22. Quality
of life
Comments
Post a Comment
Please Comment.