Skip to main content

Murder

Murder-rates, that is, intentional murder, are in the news at least every couple of weeks. So, where are all these murders occurring?  We look at world murder-rates data, all of which is online.  Where is the USA, and where are the largest murder rates?  Are murder rates connected with gun ownership, or with corruption?  Questions like these seem to have obvious answers, both yes.

The results tell a different story.  First here is a table of countries with the highest murder rates. The rates given below are per 100,000 people per year. 

Rank
Country
Rate
Count
ZONE
1
 El Salvador
108.64
6,656
Americas
Central America
2
 Honduras
63.75
5,148
Americas
Central America
3
 Venezuela
57.15
17,778
Americas
South America
4
 United States Virgin Islands
52.64
56
Americas
Caribbean
5
 Jamaica
43.21
1,207
Americas
Caribbean
6
 Lesotho
38.00
764
Africa
Southern Africa
7
 Belize
34.40
121
Americas
Central America
8
 South Africa
34.27
18,673
Africa
Southern Africa
9
 Saint Kitts and Nevis
33.55
18
Americas
Caribbean
10
 Guatemala
31.21
4,998
Americas
Central America
11
 Trinidad and Tobago
30.88
420
Americas
Caribbean
12
 Bahamas
29.81
111
Americas
Caribbean
13
 Anguilla (UK)
27.66
4
Americas
Caribbean
14
 Brazil
26.74
55,574
Americas
South America
15
 Colombia
26.50
12,782
Americas
South America

As is evident El Salvador has the highest murder rate by far. The Americas are most represented, though Africa is well represented.  In fact, overall, Southern Africa, as a group, has the highest murder-rates.  The murder rate is the USA is 4.88, well below the halfway mark of all countries.  This makes the USA relatively safe, except maybe Chicago, which accounts for about 4-5% of all murders in the US.   

We ask if there is a correlation with gang activity, and while this may be so, gang population data is difficult to obtain by country. A research question for some PhD thesis for sure.

The countries with the lowest murder rates are located in Europe, though not eastern Europe.  The rates are in the 1-2 murders per 100,000 people.  Canada is also very low, but Mexico has nearly four times the murder-rate as the US. Australia and New Zealand are also very low, in the European range. 

In the interest of keeping this note short we now pose the question of correlation with the prevalence of guns.  Here the USA is tops, by a lot.   The highest rates of gun ownership (per 100 people) are given below.
Rank
Country
Guns per 100
1
 United States
112.6
2
 Serbia
58.2
3
 Yemen
54.8
4
 Cyprus
36.4
5
 Saudi Arabia
35.0
6
 Iraq
34.2
7
 Finland
34.2
8
 Uruguay
31.8
9
 Sweden
31.6
10
 Norway
31.3
11
 France
31.2
12
 Canada
30.8
13
 Austria
30.4
14
 Iceland
30.3
15
 Germany
30.3
Some of the countries with the lowest murder rates have the highest gun ownership.  Consider Finland, a really peaceful country. Lots of guns there.  (Russia, on the other hand, with far less than half the population of the US has about the same total number of murders.) But the above table is just 15 of more than 170 countries for which we found data.  It turns out that gun ownership has essentially a zero correlation with gun ownership.  No connection statistically. This was my first surprise.

Surely the murder-rate must be correlated with corruption.  Seems like "yes" on this one.  However, again, the correlation was essentially zero, my second surprise.  This implies no case can be made that corrupt countries have higher murder rates or vice-versa.  Corruption data comes from transparency-international.

Finally, we examined the wealth disparity of countries as compared with murder rates.  Now we got something.  The correlation there was about 4/10, implying at best a moderate relation.  Loosely speaking, we can say murder-rates are higher when wealth distribution is more unequal, as measured by the GINI index.  BTW, on this index, the USA is about in the middle of all countries.  Haiti has about the highest wealth disparity, i.e. lots of poor with just a few holding all the wealth.

Well, maybe if we considered a correlation  of the incarceration rate with the murder rate.  Surely, the more murders the greater the incarceration?  Here the correlation is a mere 0.26, meaning this correlation is even less than with disparity of wealth.  

The upshot here was a surprise.  I surely would have thought the more guns the more murders.  This is on the news all the time, but it is simply not so.  I could find no strong correlation of murder-rates with any particular factor.

A final note.  Correlation is different from causality!!! Confuse them not.

BTW, worldwide, there are about 390,000 intentional murders each year giving a murder-rate of about 5.34 per 100,000 people.

Note: if you wish to pursue this line of question, note there is a wide difference in the names given to the same country from source to source.

References (a few)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimated_number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_by_murder_rate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...