Skip to main content

Bad News for Tennis Pros

Tennis in 2017.  I am well into a study of tennis professionals, looking over their careers.  Here are some preliminary conclusions.  They may apply to your very own world – particularly if you vie for a top spot at whatever you do. 

Looking at top-100 ranked pros over the last twenty years, we note there are only four hovering at the top.  They are Andy Murray (now #1), Novac Djokovic, Roger Federer, and Rafael Nadal.  Also we include Stan Warinka, currently ranked #3. Here are a couple of observations about the top players.  All entered the top 100 in the lower half.  (Many were ranked below number 100 for a year or so after turning pro.)  These four have been at the top for years now.

All rankings are based strictly on tournament performance and how they performed.  Sports writers notwithstanding, did not play a role.

After a season or two with low rankings they emerged to the very top echelon right away.  They stayed there year-after-year. For example, from 2005 to present*, Djokovic was ranked 83 16 3 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 2.   This is typical.  There is one exception, Warinka, who happily proves the rule.  He actually worked his way up in rankings year-by-year.  Over the same years his rankings were 55 30 36 13 13 21 17 17 8 4 4 4 3. 

For Murray, Djokovic, Federer, and Nadal, the rapid-rise pattern is sustained. The rule seems to be that most players at the very top achieve their status rapidly after turning professional.  Others linger in the second tier ranks.  For example, the record of Thomas Berdych, a great player, over the period 2004 to present  is 45 25 13 14 20 20 6 7 6 7 7 6 10 13.

Tennis history indicates Berdych has reached his peak.  This is not to say being ranked at #6 or #10 is bad, it is to say there is appears to be no upward trajectory in sight. Current players, and relative newcomers that may have a shot at the top are Krygios and Sock, and possibly Raonic.  However, current data is inconclusive, as all are newcomers. 

The lesson here is that if you’re going to be a very top player, you get there quickly and then stay there.  BTW, there are over 1000 current players all hoping for a top spot.  More to come.


*All rankings are recored at year’s-end.  Note also, the maximal professional career of a tennis player is about twenty years, mostly less. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more