Skip to main content

Bad News for Tennis Pros

Tennis in 2017.  I am well into a study of tennis professionals, looking over their careers.  Here are some preliminary conclusions.  They may apply to your very own world – particularly if you vie for a top spot at whatever you do. 

Looking at top-100 ranked pros over the last twenty years, we note there are only four hovering at the top.  They are Andy Murray (now #1), Novac Djokovic, Roger Federer, and Rafael Nadal.  Also we include Stan Warinka, currently ranked #3. Here are a couple of observations about the top players.  All entered the top 100 in the lower half.  (Many were ranked below number 100 for a year or so after turning pro.)  These four have been at the top for years now.

All rankings are based strictly on tournament performance and how they performed.  Sports writers notwithstanding, did not play a role.

After a season or two with low rankings they emerged to the very top echelon right away.  They stayed there year-after-year. For example, from 2005 to present*, Djokovic was ranked 83 16 3 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 2.   This is typical.  There is one exception, Warinka, who happily proves the rule.  He actually worked his way up in rankings year-by-year.  Over the same years his rankings were 55 30 36 13 13 21 17 17 8 4 4 4 3. 

For Murray, Djokovic, Federer, and Nadal, the rapid-rise pattern is sustained. The rule seems to be that most players at the very top achieve their status rapidly after turning professional.  Others linger in the second tier ranks.  For example, the record of Thomas Berdych, a great player, over the period 2004 to present  is 45 25 13 14 20 20 6 7 6 7 7 6 10 13.

Tennis history indicates Berdych has reached his peak.  This is not to say being ranked at #6 or #10 is bad, it is to say there is appears to be no upward trajectory in sight. Current players, and relative newcomers that may have a shot at the top are Krygios and Sock, and possibly Raonic.  However, current data is inconclusive, as all are newcomers. 

The lesson here is that if you’re going to be a very top player, you get there quickly and then stay there.  BTW, there are over 1000 current players all hoping for a top spot.  More to come.


*All rankings are recored at year’s-end.  Note also, the maximal professional career of a tennis player is about twenty years, mostly less. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03
Post a Comment
Read more

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view
Post a Comment
Read more