Skip to main content

Thoughts XXX - Twitter, goals, surely



Between Clinton, de Blasio, and Trump, we have a new meaning for what happens on the Tweets of New York. :)

My goodness, twitter-izing seems to be a new form of open warfare.  Have you been twitter-ized yet? 

_________________
There are approximately 4.5 characters/word in the English language.  So how many Tweets would it take to broadcast some of our greatest literature and other documents? Note a Tweet is 140 characters, max.  Here’s a brief list. Spaces are not counted.

Author Title Words Characters Number of Tweets
US Congress ObamaCare (ACA) 11,588,500 52,148,250 372,488
King James Version Bible 783,137 3,524,117 25,172
Leo Tolstoy War and Peace 587,000 2,641,500 18,868
Margaret Mitchell Gone with the Wind 418,053 1,881,239 13,437
J.K. Rowling Harry Potter Goblet of Fire 190,637 857,867 6,128
Muhammad Qur'an 77,449 348,521 2,489
George Orwell Animal Farm 29,966 134,847 963
John Steinbeck Of Mice and Men 29,160 131,220 937
Founding Fathers USA Constitution 4,372 19,674 141
Abraham Lincoln Gettysburg Address 272 1,224 9
_________________
If you do want to include the spaces, then each word will have 5.5 characters.  So multiply the number of tweets by 5.5/4.5 = 11/9.  Or simply increase the number of tweets by about 20%.

_________________
 Consider for a moment you have just passed away.  Many things you could have said or done to family or friends are then permanently sealed against the possibility.  Maybe, you should consider acting upon such things a bit sooner.

_________________
According to American philosopher Daniel Dennett, the “surely” alarm is that part of an argument or proof, where the protagonist invokes a phrase of the type “Surely, you see that…” or something similar.  This is the weak point exposed on center stage.  It is the point you are expected to accept without further inspection.  Call it the weak link, the flaw, the gap, the great leap, or what have you.  Surely you agree.  

_________________
When it comes to achieving goals, if you don’t believe in yourself, you won’t achieve them. This is according to research from LSU that those believing in themselves use more of the cognitive part of their brain.  They are willing and even eager to demand more from their cognitive capacity toward problem-solving.  When you believe in yourself, you demand more of yourself.  When others believe in you, they give more consideration, more opportunity, more help, and better teaching.  Why?  One reason is because they believe their effort is not wasted.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view