Skip to main content

Thoughts XXX - Twitter, goals, surely



Between Clinton, de Blasio, and Trump, we have a new meaning for what happens on the Tweets of New York. :)

My goodness, twitter-izing seems to be a new form of open warfare.  Have you been twitter-ized yet? 

_________________
There are approximately 4.5 characters/word in the English language.  So how many Tweets would it take to broadcast some of our greatest literature and other documents? Note a Tweet is 140 characters, max.  Here’s a brief list. Spaces are not counted.

Author Title Words Characters Number of Tweets
US Congress ObamaCare (ACA) 11,588,500 52,148,250 372,488
King James Version Bible 783,137 3,524,117 25,172
Leo Tolstoy War and Peace 587,000 2,641,500 18,868
Margaret Mitchell Gone with the Wind 418,053 1,881,239 13,437
J.K. Rowling Harry Potter Goblet of Fire 190,637 857,867 6,128
Muhammad Qur'an 77,449 348,521 2,489
George Orwell Animal Farm 29,966 134,847 963
John Steinbeck Of Mice and Men 29,160 131,220 937
Founding Fathers USA Constitution 4,372 19,674 141
Abraham Lincoln Gettysburg Address 272 1,224 9
_________________
If you do want to include the spaces, then each word will have 5.5 characters.  So multiply the number of tweets by 5.5/4.5 = 11/9.  Or simply increase the number of tweets by about 20%.

_________________
 Consider for a moment you have just passed away.  Many things you could have said or done to family or friends are then permanently sealed against the possibility.  Maybe, you should consider acting upon such things a bit sooner.

_________________
According to American philosopher Daniel Dennett, the “surely” alarm is that part of an argument or proof, where the protagonist invokes a phrase of the type “Surely, you see that…” or something similar.  This is the weak point exposed on center stage.  It is the point you are expected to accept without further inspection.  Call it the weak link, the flaw, the gap, the great leap, or what have you.  Surely you agree.  

_________________
When it comes to achieving goals, if you don’t believe in yourself, you won’t achieve them. This is according to research from LSU that those believing in themselves use more of the cognitive part of their brain.  They are willing and even eager to demand more from their cognitive capacity toward problem-solving.  When you believe in yourself, you demand more of yourself.  When others believe in you, they give more consideration, more opportunity, more help, and better teaching.  Why?  One reason is because they believe their effort is not wasted.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

No Sympathy From Me

Suicide Coming Home Many years ago, a friend hung himself in his basement.  I was a pall-bearer at his funeral. I was shocked I was so asked.  I did this.  I did not understand why a good-looking fellow, intelligent, kindly, and true could do such a thing. He did. I do not.  His family suffered greatly.  Yet he left no issue.   Thankfully. To my mind Country singer Mindy McCready, 37, showed us the very height of personal selfishness by committing suicide.  By giving birth to two offspring, she accepted the responsibility to raise her newborn and six-year old son.  She abrogated it spectacularly.  (As did the father a month ago.)  Though she may have suffered depression for any number of reasons, she has little sympathy from me for leaving behind a legacy that is now lost, is now parent-less, and may drift into problems of their own in the future.    There is shame and heartbreak in all this, but blame should be...

Problem Solving - Murder

Abstract  Most certainly, a homicide investigation is a problem-solving event and requires tools and intelligence similar to most scientific research. A homicide investigation is the most rigorous application of the state’s police power. This paper examines the structural framework of these investigations, focusing on the psychological profile of the detective, the procedural utility of the "Murder Manual" and "Murder Book," and the taxonomy of investigative problems. This essay is about solving a murder, though by synthesizing these theories with the 2026 Nancy Guthrie abduction/presumptive homicide case in Arizona, it illustrates the shift from physical evidence to "digital and medical absence" as an essential tool for prosecution in "no-body" cases. Here is a table of contents for this essay. 1.      The Homicide Detective 2.      The Murder Book and Murder Manual 3.      The Complexity of Homicide 4.  ...