Skip to main content

Ultimate Extortion



One political type made an accurate point about all the Hillary emails, of which there have been thousands, that being none from Bernie or Donald have appeared.  He asked why we haven’t seen any from Trump?  Could be the Trump group has better security?  Absolute security is easy and almost free, if you want to use it.  It is a certainty that Hillary was careless about security.  The reason is simple.  Neither she nor her team fully understood how easy hacking can be. 

One thing I've learned is many of those at premier levels do not respond well to new things.  To plead ignorance or amateur status, they expose themselves to themselves and to others.  Old hands have trouble with new events and new concepts. So, they hide it or ignore what's happening.  Another reason exists, perhaps about Trump but certainly about others.  
We generalize beyond Donald as he is unlikely to win the election.  Why can it not be so that multiple, maybe hundreds, of important politicians have been hacked of an assortment of electronic records? First, if one uses gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, or any of the other services, whatever they transmit still exists on corporate servers - to which dozens, probably hundreds, have access.   These people, with Hillary as the prototype, become incredibly vulnerable to manipulation ans exposure. Even those using .gov and state government services, as we’ve seen, are also vulnerable (IRS, Office of Personnel Management, NSC, U.S. Department of Justice, Arizona and Illinois voting records  and more).  It is common knowledge, but rarely reported here, that other governments have been widely hacked.  Hacking of colleges for data and corporations of both data and corporate designs are rampant (LinkedIn, Target, Niemann-Marcus, Yahoo, UC Berkeley, Med-Star Health, and dozens more).
Even Mary, Queen of Scots, message, who actually used secret codes, was hacked in a plot to assassinate Queen Elizabeth, and then she was hacked (1586) in a more permanent way.
Here’s the big point.  The dump of Hillary's emails may just be the proof of concept, the willingness by bad actors to release and destroy unless ...  When applied to hundreds of political and other important people, this could amount to the ultimate international extortion at a level beyond anything seen before in human history.  Moreover, we may never know, while we lose everything due to extorted inaction.
Recommendation. Serious regulations need to be enacted for email and electronic protection for all public figures and records. Secure methods exist.  Really smart people use them.  Why can’t the US government?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. -------------------------