Skip to main content

Ultimate Extortion



One political type made an accurate point about all the Hillary emails, of which there have been thousands, that being none from Bernie or Donald have appeared.  He asked why we haven’t seen any from Trump?  Could be the Trump group has better security?  Absolute security is easy and almost free, if you want to use it.  It is a certainty that Hillary was careless about security.  The reason is simple.  Neither she nor her team fully understood how easy hacking can be. 

One thing I've learned is many of those at premier levels do not respond well to new things.  To plead ignorance or amateur status, they expose themselves to themselves and to others.  Old hands have trouble with new events and new concepts. So, they hide it or ignore what's happening.  Another reason exists, perhaps about Trump but certainly about others.  
We generalize beyond Donald as he is unlikely to win the election.  Why can it not be so that multiple, maybe hundreds, of important politicians have been hacked of an assortment of electronic records? First, if one uses gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, or any of the other services, whatever they transmit still exists on corporate servers - to which dozens, probably hundreds, have access.   These people, with Hillary as the prototype, become incredibly vulnerable to manipulation ans exposure. Even those using .gov and state government services, as we’ve seen, are also vulnerable (IRS, Office of Personnel Management, NSC, U.S. Department of Justice, Arizona and Illinois voting records  and more).  It is common knowledge, but rarely reported here, that other governments have been widely hacked.  Hacking of colleges for data and corporations of both data and corporate designs are rampant (LinkedIn, Target, Niemann-Marcus, Yahoo, UC Berkeley, Med-Star Health, and dozens more).
Even Mary, Queen of Scots, message, who actually used secret codes, was hacked in a plot to assassinate Queen Elizabeth, and then she was hacked (1586) in a more permanent way.
Here’s the big point.  The dump of Hillary's emails may just be the proof of concept, the willingness by bad actors to release and destroy unless ...  When applied to hundreds of political and other important people, this could amount to the ultimate international extortion at a level beyond anything seen before in human history.  Moreover, we may never know, while we lose everything due to extorted inaction.
Recommendation. Serious regulations need to be enacted for email and electronic protection for all public figures and records. Secure methods exist.  Really smart people use them.  Why can’t the US government?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view