Skip to main content

On Government II






The setting:  The government is an enterprise of millions of employees, led by politicians, who really don’t know how to do anything.  Below them are political appointees, sometimes skilled at something different and at a vastly smaller scale.  Below them are civil servants, who function as highest level operational administrators.  They are normally paid substantially less that commercial counterparts.  Thus, not the highest quality folks are retained.  Below them are the midlevel administrators whose abilities range from very good to terrible, biased toward the lower end.  Since they have total job security, there is little incentive to perform well, even if they could.  This higher level structure diffuses to the entire government enterprise.  Making it bigger will simply require hiring more lower-quality administrators entrusted with higher-level functions.  Will not work.


Government service summary:
At the higher levels: fish out of water
At the lower levels: fish that can’t swim.
------------------------

We are witnessing and are participants in the complete government absorption of the citizenry to some postmodern vision.  It seems to be essentially a non-human super-agency, without sensitivity to the maintenance and long term health and well-being of the populace.

1. The government essentially views itself as if in a cocoon isolated from the world.
2. It is blind to external threats.
3. It assumes that whatever it does, prosperity will sustain. 
4. It cannot comprehend public deterioration from within, whether spiritual, moral, or financial.
5. It views every social or fiscal problem has a regulatory solution.
6. It believes the country it inherited can be fundamentally changed, and vastly improved within its vision.
7. It reacts to problems with solutions without consideration of unintended consequences.  Basically, it treats a symptom of a problem, leaving the problem intact.

------------------

In brief, this monolithic, almost all powerful government seems to be rather naive about the nature of the people it governs.



Gettysburg revisited: Mover over Abe!  It’s official: “Our government by the people, for the people, and of the people…” has been tidied up.  Now it’s “Our government to the people… .”  Said an administration spokesperson, “The original version was too complicated for people to understand.  We have simplified it.  This change will be reflected on all government instruments including the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view