Skip to main content

On Government II






The setting:  The government is an enterprise of millions of employees, led by politicians, who really don’t know how to do anything.  Below them are political appointees, sometimes skilled at something different and at a vastly smaller scale.  Below them are civil servants, who function as highest level operational administrators.  They are normally paid substantially less that commercial counterparts.  Thus, not the highest quality folks are retained.  Below them are the midlevel administrators whose abilities range from very good to terrible, biased toward the lower end.  Since they have total job security, there is little incentive to perform well, even if they could.  This higher level structure diffuses to the entire government enterprise.  Making it bigger will simply require hiring more lower-quality administrators entrusted with higher-level functions.  Will not work.


Government service summary:
At the higher levels: fish out of water
At the lower levels: fish that can’t swim.
------------------------

We are witnessing and are participants in the complete government absorption of the citizenry to some postmodern vision.  It seems to be essentially a non-human super-agency, without sensitivity to the maintenance and long term health and well-being of the populace.

1. The government essentially views itself as if in a cocoon isolated from the world.
2. It is blind to external threats.
3. It assumes that whatever it does, prosperity will sustain. 
4. It cannot comprehend public deterioration from within, whether spiritual, moral, or financial.
5. It views every social or fiscal problem has a regulatory solution.
6. It believes the country it inherited can be fundamentally changed, and vastly improved within its vision.
7. It reacts to problems with solutions without consideration of unintended consequences.  Basically, it treats a symptom of a problem, leaving the problem intact.

------------------

In brief, this monolithic, almost all powerful government seems to be rather naive about the nature of the people it governs.



Gettysburg revisited: Mover over Abe!  It’s official: “Our government by the people, for the people, and of the people…” has been tidied up.  Now it’s “Our government to the people… .”  Said an administration spokesperson, “The original version was too complicated for people to understand.  We have simplified it.  This change will be reflected on all government instruments including the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...