Skip to main content

The Darkness of Big Data

One thing you may have noticed is that once you look online for something, almost anything, the story does not end with the search.  In fact the story does not end at all. Search for anything on eBay or perhaps Amazon, and they know and remember.  Whether though cookies or login data, they know you are interested.  Their big data enterprise keeps a careful track of every click you make.  While you sleep, their servers stay awake making calculations and correlations of what could titillate your interests.

A few months ago, I looked on one of these sites for tiny cameras.  I even bought one for about eight bucks.  Didn't work well. Since that time I've received dozens of promotions from that same site for other such devices.  There seems no end of it.  The other day I searched online for the Harvard Classics, a set of 51 volumes of world literature.  Two days later, I found an add for the same on my Facebook page.   This is one big data system talking with another.

I remember the day where advertisements were in newspapers, magazines and TV.  These were passive in comparison. Take them or not, any inquiry ended with an activity to buy or not..  No longer.   Your entire track record is now available to data miners.   But this is just the tip.   This information is for sale.  Suppose I look at this site for tiny camera, running shoes, and biographies of American Presidents.  (I have.)  The big data engines know this and in the darkness of my night, they will determine correlations through machine learning engines on what other items might be attractive to me.  (They have.)

Is this a good thing?  The way I have cast it:  No!  But such engines could also possibly determine people with more dangerous proclivities. Like terrorism.  This could be good!

Nonetheless, data mining, correlations, and predictions are now a part of our reality. 

Most of you reading this have little idea what what data mining can actually do, and has done.  I do not, myself.  It is a challenge to understand.  It is like the God of our childhood seeing all and knowing all.  Statistically of course.  But it is a rather dark engine that lives among us.  It was not created to make us better.  It was created because it could be.  This is not unlike advances in science, to develop because it is possible.

We have discussed only what a few simple commercial sites are doing.  Small fry stuff. Can you imagine what the big boys are doing, those who build the browsers and search engines you love to use?  They are those with unlimited computing resources, and who merely smile at exabytes of data as simple information.  They likely know more about you than you do.

We are probably entering an information crisis, that most politicians scarcely understand, though both political parties are trying to exploit.   The parties know down to the precinct level, what are the voter tendencies and preferences. Nowadays, when I'm asked to do a survey on fundamentally anything.  I decline.  Though, if the truth be told, even the declination is usable information.

Remember, correlation is the new form of causality, whether, Bayesian, Pearson, or logistic.   And not a good form.

My goodness, this is getting depressing.   Though I could continue on for a spell, I'll stop.  One word of advice.  Don't respond to any online survey.  It is not to serve better, but to sell you better, whatever the item.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view