Skip to main content

Idea Space - Part II



IDEA SPACE – PART II, THE IDEA OF IDEAS

The is the second part of our blog on ideas but stands independently.  See http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2014/07/idea-space-part-i.html
What is the “idea of ideas?”  It is the conceptual framework through which problems are solved.  Prior to solving any problem whatever, it is key to have an approach to solving the problem.  This is the idea!  It could be routine, an idea applied previously.  It could be a variation on other successful ideas.  It could be complex requiring some approach beyond the norms of normal problem solving.  It could be dictated by belief or better put fit within the constraints of faith.  Yet, prior to any solution offered, there must be an idea that proceeds the solution.  This is the firmament upon which solutions are formed.  We have problem →idea → solution.  The idea is the forms the first steps on the pathway toward the solution.   The idea is a “proto-solution.”  It is a first glimmer.  If there were no problems, there would be no ideas. 

In writing this short note we are calling upon ideas about the idea of ideas.  This puts it clearly within some meta-idea space of thought.
This intermediate step to problem solutions is offered in many guises, from instinct to innovation.   It is the essence of problem solutions.   In other terms this “idea” could be also called
  •  An approach
  • A method
  • A technique
Whatever it’s called, it forms the gateway to viable solutions.   Is it almost impossible to solve a problem without some idea on how to proceed.  If problems were totally simple, with methods prescribed such as in a basic math or chemistry course, the notion of the idea is missed, because the idea and methods are co-mingled.  One learns methods co-embedded with the idea.  Change the problem from the routine to the particular, and a new idea may be required.   The idea separates a viable pathway from the countless others.  It is a specific type of intuition. 

Therefore, the idea of ideas must be addressed.  We claim that when impossible problems arise within an area and such ideas persist regardless of solutions based on the extant theories, then a new idea is required.  It is then a new idea is produced, with the question of whether it is the right idea.  It is an ideas sweepstakes.  Most entries are bogus.  Some are viable.  The idea of all ideas is the winner in the competition as to which is most predictive.

Many events can influence which idea is the (first) winner.  Most of them fall in the context of experience with standard problem solving methods,  BRAIPIE. (See http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2013/02/problem-solving-your-marvelous-brain.html)  Not necessarily is the best idea selected.  Depending on intrinsic criteria, the winning idea to solution is selected.  All to often it is wrong.  Selecting the idea, rejecting the idea, and creating a new idea is part of the process.  

Each idea addresses a facet of the problem.  The correct or successful idea addresses the greatest number of facets. It is really impossible to create general principles for all subject areas combined.  But is it?  We examine simple area states and their particular needs for ideas. 

We consider here a necessary construct from IDEA SPACE discussed in our previous post.  We must in this case look towards specific disciplines and seek what may be needed within it.  We ask questions
  1. For this area are new ideas needed?
  2. For this area are is the theory able to construct answers to given problems?
  3. For this area are there emerging problems beyond the scope of current ideas?
What is the current vector of the specific area?  It is in a cleaning mode, a question mode, or a “at loss” mode with a question there but without ideas to solve them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view