Skip to main content

Thoughts XXIX - Berlin, Trump, and Obama



Terrorist attack in Berlin.  It seems the perpetrator of the truck attack at a Christmas market in Berlin left in the truck not only his immigration papers (to be deported) but also his wallet.  I’m a simple guy that would never leave my wallet in any place but my pocket.  Most guys are like this, as women leave documents in her purse.  One basic conclusion is that our rather stupid perpetrator, Anis Amri, is deeply dead and concealed probably at the hands of his own group, with his documents used to deflect investigations from the trail.  Amri has a perfect profile for exploitation.
Note, terrorists place little value on life, even their own.
If what I’ve said makes sense, it signals a new approach to terrorism, one in which there is a serious and very secret core group willing to carry out terrorist acts, and moreover willing to sacrifice any and all toward that end.  The war of terrorists becomes ever more dangerous.  Their motto may be: to use the mass refugee presence as a foil to promote and permute terrorism everywhere. One could say this approach exploits the “lone wolf” paradigm, so much hoped for by some western government officials.
____________
Skill sets. Trump enjoys making deals, particularly negotiating with other parties to make a better deal.  He just plain enjoys the work, and he’s good at it.
Obama enjoys anything pertaining to racial enhancement, racial divide, and racial issues of all forms. He just plain enjoys it, and he’s good at it.
Both have finely tuned skills at such tasks.  Pertaining to foreign policy, Obama failed because his skill set did not apply. For Trump, his success may depend on how foreign policy matters can be cast as deals.  To be seen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...