Repackaging Math. Can it work for easier understanding?

A common misconception is that mathematics appears difficult to some learners merely because of the manner in which it is presented. According to this view, if the curriculum were simply redesigned with more effective packaging, the subject would become universally accessible. This assumption, however, does not withstand scrutiny. Mathematics, even at its most elementary level, is inherently abstract. Its foundational concept—numbers—is not an instinctive capacity of the human brain, but rather a construct that requires deliberate training to comprehend (Dehaene, 2011). The subsequent development of arithmetic skills similarly demands sustained practice, patience, and discipline, with some learners requiring considerably more time than others to achieve proficiency (Geary, 2013).

Efforts to reform the teaching of mathematics are not new. For centuries, educators have attempted to devise methods of instruction that would render mathematics easier to learn. If a universally effective pedagogical strategy existed, it would likely have been discovered by now. Nevertheless, curriculum designers continue to introduce revisions, often on a cyclical basis, in pursuit of an idealized approach that emphasizes the practical or engaging aspects of mathematics. Despite these efforts, empirical evidence suggests otherwise: in the United States, average mathematics scores have steadily declined, reflecting an ongoing failure to ensure mastery of even the most basic competencies (National Center for Education Statistics [NCES], 2022).

One factor contributing to this problem is well documented: some teachers harbor a personal dislike or even fear of mathematics. This attitude often permeates the classroom, transmitting anxiety to students and undermining their confidence (Beilock, Gunderson, Ramirez, & Levine, 2010). Enhancing teachers’ mathematical competence and comfort is therefore a critical step toward improving outcomes. Simply put, individuals who dislike or fear mathematics are unlikely to teach it effectively, regardless of the instructional strategies employed.

The key takeaway of this is that we have learned many things that are fundamentally abstract to the brain. For these, it can take much time to learn them – often without shortcuts.

P.S. This is a slight revision of a contribution I previously made to quora.com

References

Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(5), 1860–1863. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910967107
Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics (Revised and updated ed.). Oxford University Press.
Geary, D. C. (2013). Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412469398
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). NAEP report card: Mathematics results. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard

Lies, Deceit, and the National Agenda

The world you grew up in is no more. The world of reasonable honesty and reasonable lies has been replaced by abject dishonesty and blatant lies. Lies. Yes. People have always told them. You have told them; so have I. We need lies; they are a foundational structure of social living. They both deceive and protect. Children tell them to their parents to avoid consequences, like punishment. Adults tell them to their bosses, to enhance their position and/or avoid consequences of poor performance. Our bosses tell them to their boards to suggest business is good, the project is on target, or the detractors are wrong. The boards tell them to shareholders to protect their own credibility and most importantly, stock values. Our politicians tell lies to their constituents, though sometimes innocently with them not actually knowing much more than they've been told. They enhance their positio...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1. Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty. This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

CERTAINTY IS ALSO AN EMOTION

Certainty is also a Feeling Certainty is often viewed as a mental state tied to knowledge and confidence, but it also functions as a feeling with distinct emotional and physiological components. While it arises from cognitive processes, certainty also has a subjective and emotional quality that makes it more than just a rational judgment. It provides a sense of assurance and security that shapes human experience in profound ways. Emotional Dimension . At its core, certainty evokes emotions that influence how we perceive and interact with the world. When someone feels certain, they often experience relief, comfort, or empowerment. These emotions are particularly strong when uncertainty or doubt is resolved, offering a sense of closure. For example, solving a complex problem or having a belief validated by evidence brings not just intellectual satisfaction but also emotional reassurance. Subjectivity. Certainty is inherently personal and subjective. It depends on individual...

First Blog

Search This Blog