Skip to main content

What is "Argumentum ad Ignorantiam"?

 What is "Argumentum ad Ignorantiam"?

Argument from ignorance known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. Here is a particularly blatant, simple, example, “Although we have proven that the moon is not made of spare ribs, we have not proven that its core cannot be filled with them; therefore, the moon's core is filled with spare ribs[1].” The famous aphorism, “No news is good news,” used all the time, is a classic. In fact, it’s used so often that many of us believe it’s true!

Arguments from ignorance are relatively easy to spot, though they’re used all the time.  However, it’s more dangerous use is personal. Some people may say that I have tried to prove “A” but could not, so now I am convinced “A” must be false. The "argumentum ad ignorantiam" is also a form of self-deception, and the logical fallacy based on authority or absence thereof. A weaker form would be to say, “No one has been able to do this, therefore I cannot either.”

I have heard this argument used particularly by atheists. (Bear in mind, we are not making an argument for or against – just looking at arguments used.) They argue that they have studied the matter and found no convincing argument that God exists, and therefore on an “intellectual” basis there can be no God. Similarly, one may say, “I’ve never seen proofs (or evidence) of miracles, therefore there are no miracles.

It is easy to see how ignorance allows an apparently logical conclusion where there is none.


[1] Bennett, Bo. "Argument from Ignorance". www.LogicallyFallacious.com. Retrieved 23 November 2016.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...