How Can Some Speakers Go On and On?

Public speakers can generally be categorized into two groups: Type A and Type B. Type A speakers, which include most of us, formulate thoughts through introspection, utilizing the frontal lobe of the brain, before converting these thoughts into speech via the Broca's area.

Contrastingly, Type B speakers, like Congressman Crockett (D-TX), engage in a different process where speech itself generates thought. For these individuals, the Broca's area is where thought begins as speech, which then migrates to the frontal lobe. This isn't a deficiency but rather a unique cognitive talent, though not necessarily linked to deep thinking. Type B speakers are often characterized by their verbosity rather than the depth of their thought.

Over the years, we've encountered numerous Type B personalities, notably among preachers, politicians, talk show hosts, sportscasters, and those friends who seem to never stop talking. A classic example is Fidel Castro, known for marathon speeches that often recycled old rhetoric rather than offering new insights. This leads us to ponder how some people can speak at length without substantive content. Simply put, Type B individuals don't think unless they're speaking.

Here are additional examples of individuals or professions that might be considered Type B public speakers:

Motivational Speakers: Some motivational speakers might rely heavily on the energy and flow of their speech to inspire, often repeating well-rehearsed phrases or stories rather than engaging in deep, reflective thought.

Stand-Up Comedians: While many comedians are brilliant thinkers, some might fall into the Type B category, where their humor and ideas are developed or refined live on stage through the act of speaking rather than through prior deep contemplation.

Reality TV Stars: Known for their ability to talk extensively about themselves or their experiences with little need for introspection, often filling airtime with spontaneous commentary rather than considered thought.

Social Media Influencers: Especially those who livestream or do daily vlogs, where the act of speaking can lead to the development of ideas or opinions in real-time, rather than having a pre-formulated thought process.

Debaters in Competitive Settings: Some debaters might speak to clarify or even discover their own positions on an issue during the debate itself, particularly in impromptu scenarios where preparation time is limited.

Radio Talk Show Hosts: Especially those who thrive on live, unscripted conversation, where their thoughts evolve as they speak, sometimes leading to controversial or off-the-cuff remarks.

Political Commentators: Certain commentators on news channels might speak for hours on various topics, often repeating points or filling time with rhetoric rather than deep analysis, especially during live segments.

Actors in Improv: In improvisational theater, actors must think on their feet, often speaking first and then justifying their actions or words, which can be seen as a form of Type B thinking where speech leads to thought.

These examples illustrate individuals or roles where speaking is not just a means of communication but is integral to the process of thinking or idea formulation, suggesting that for these Type B personalities, the act of speaking can be a catalyst for thought rather than merely a vehicle for expressing pre-existing ideas.

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I. I. Introduction. Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II. ...

The Lemming Instinct

In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

The principles we use but don't know it. 1. Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

First Blog

Search This Blog