Skip to main content

How Can Some Speakers Go On and On?

Public speakers can generally be categorized into two groups: Type A and Type B. Type A speakers, which include most of us, formulate thoughts through introspection, utilizing the frontal lobe of the brain, before converting these thoughts into speech via the Broca's area.

Contrastingly, Type B speakers, like Congressman Crockett (D-TX), engage in a different process where speech itself generates thought. For these individuals, the Broca's area is where thought begins as speech, which then migrates to the frontal lobe. This isn't a deficiency but rather a unique cognitive talent, though not necessarily linked to deep thinking. Type B speakers are often characterized by their verbosity rather than the depth of their thought.

Over the years, we've encountered numerous Type B personalities, notably among preachers, politicians, talk show hosts, sportscasters, and those friends who seem to never stop talking. A classic example is Fidel Castro, known for marathon speeches that often recycled old rhetoric rather than offering new insights. This leads us to ponder how some people can speak at length without substantive content. Simply put, Type B individuals don't think unless they're speaking.

Here are additional examples of individuals or professions that might be considered Type B public speakers:

Motivational Speakers: Some motivational speakers might rely heavily on the energy and flow of their speech to inspire, often repeating well-rehearsed phrases or stories rather than engaging in deep, reflective thought.

Stand-Up Comedians: While many comedians are brilliant thinkers, some might fall into the Type B category, where their humor and ideas are developed or refined live on stage through the act of speaking rather than through prior deep contemplation.

Reality TV Stars: Known for their ability to talk extensively about themselves or their experiences with little need for introspection, often filling airtime with spontaneous commentary rather than considered thought.

Social Media Influencers: Especially those who livestream or do daily vlogs, where the act of speaking can lead to the development of ideas or opinions in real-time, rather than having a pre-formulated thought process.

Debaters in Competitive Settings: Some debaters might speak to clarify or even discover their own positions on an issue during the debate itself, particularly in impromptu scenarios where preparation time is limited.

Radio Talk Show Hosts: Especially those who thrive on live, unscripted conversation, where their thoughts evolve as they speak, sometimes leading to controversial or off-the-cuff remarks.

Political Commentators: Certain commentators on news channels might speak for hours on various topics, often repeating points or filling time with rhetoric rather than deep analysis, especially during live segments.

Actors in Improv: In improvisational theater, actors must think on their feet, often speaking first and then justifying their actions or words, which can be seen as a form of Type B thinking where speech leads to thought.

These examples illustrate individuals or roles where speaking is not just a means of communication but is integral to the process of thinking or idea formulation, suggesting that for these Type B personalities, the act of speaking can be a catalyst for thought rather than merely a vehicle for expressing pre-existing ideas.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?