Skip to main content

How Can Some Speakers Go On and On?

Public speakers can generally be categorized into two groups: Type A and Type B. Type A speakers, which include most of us, formulate thoughts through introspection, utilizing the frontal lobe of the brain, before converting these thoughts into speech via the Broca's area.

Contrastingly, Type B speakers, like Congressman Crockett (D-TX), engage in a different process where speech itself generates thought. For these individuals, the Broca's area is where thought begins as speech, which then migrates to the frontal lobe. This isn't a deficiency but rather a unique cognitive talent, though not necessarily linked to deep thinking. Type B speakers are often characterized by their verbosity rather than the depth of their thought.

Over the years, we've encountered numerous Type B personalities, notably among preachers, politicians, talk show hosts, sportscasters, and those friends who seem to never stop talking. A classic example is Fidel Castro, known for marathon speeches that often recycled old rhetoric rather than offering new insights. This leads us to ponder how some people can speak at length without substantive content. Simply put, Type B individuals don't think unless they're speaking.

Here are additional examples of individuals or professions that might be considered Type B public speakers:

Motivational Speakers: Some motivational speakers might rely heavily on the energy and flow of their speech to inspire, often repeating well-rehearsed phrases or stories rather than engaging in deep, reflective thought.

Stand-Up Comedians: While many comedians are brilliant thinkers, some might fall into the Type B category, where their humor and ideas are developed or refined live on stage through the act of speaking rather than through prior deep contemplation.

Reality TV Stars: Known for their ability to talk extensively about themselves or their experiences with little need for introspection, often filling airtime with spontaneous commentary rather than considered thought.

Social Media Influencers: Especially those who livestream or do daily vlogs, where the act of speaking can lead to the development of ideas or opinions in real-time, rather than having a pre-formulated thought process.

Debaters in Competitive Settings: Some debaters might speak to clarify or even discover their own positions on an issue during the debate itself, particularly in impromptu scenarios where preparation time is limited.

Radio Talk Show Hosts: Especially those who thrive on live, unscripted conversation, where their thoughts evolve as they speak, sometimes leading to controversial or off-the-cuff remarks.

Political Commentators: Certain commentators on news channels might speak for hours on various topics, often repeating points or filling time with rhetoric rather than deep analysis, especially during live segments.

Actors in Improv: In improvisational theater, actors must think on their feet, often speaking first and then justifying their actions or words, which can be seen as a form of Type B thinking where speech leads to thought.

These examples illustrate individuals or roles where speaking is not just a means of communication but is integral to the process of thinking or idea formulation, suggesting that for these Type B personalities, the act of speaking can be a catalyst for thought rather than merely a vehicle for expressing pre-existing ideas.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...