Skip to main content

What Sciences are Settled?

 "Settled science" refers to scientific theories and principles that are widely accepted by the scientific community because they are supported by a substantial body of evidence and have withstood rigorous testing over time. While no scientific knowledge is ever considered absolutely final, certain fields and principles are regarded as highly reliable. All of the examples below are rather solid within their scope. Five hundred years ago, none of these existed*.

1. Newtonian Mechanics (in most everyday contexts - not at quantum level)

2. The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection (but it is a process as much as a science)

3. The Germ Theory of Disease (yet other forms, e.g. prion have been found)

4. The Structure of DNA (as the key component of life)

5. Heliocentrism (the Earth revolves around the sun)

6. Plate Tectonics (originally rejected)

7. The Big Bang Theory (foundational in cosmology, but questions remain – big ones)

8. Conservation Laws (Energy, Momentum, and Mass)

9. Atomic Theory (Of course there is modern string theory, quarks, and others subparticles out there. In schools you may have learned that atoms are the building blocks of matter. That ain’t necessarily so.)

For the record climate change (science) is not settled. It is very new and there is much information/data not yet used in the models. Give it another century (the blink of an eye in science terms).

* Heliocentrism is an exception that has bounced around for millennia, though earth-centered systems lasted the longest, even up to the time of Galileo. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?