Skip to main content

Problem-Solving - Obsession

Problem-Solving - Obsession

Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end. Henry David Thoreau, Walden, "Economy," 1854.

 

Introduction. Many facets of problem-solving are well-known and understood. They range from vast knowledge to critical thinking, to intuition, to insight, and to experience. Today, we add a characteristic, though an important ingredient. It’s more like a condiment-to-food, or a sauce to a delicacy. It’s needed though sometimes not essential. It is mostly helpful with big problems, difficult problems, or imossible problems. It is the quality of obsession. Each of us has experienced obsession in one form or another and is often relieved when the problem is solved. One literally leaves oneself becoming an engine driven to resolve the matter. Obsession is an all-consuming state of mind, possessive, jealous of distractions, and impervious to interruptions. Thankfully, it passes as the problem is resolved.

Freeman Dyson. The great physicist Freeman Dyson* (1923-2020) observes, “If we had a reliable way to label our toys good and bad, it would be easy to regulate technology wisely. But we can rarely see far enough ahead to know which road leads to damnation. Whoever concerns himself with big technology, either to push it forward or to stop it, is gambling in human lives.”

 

Figure 1 Freeman Dyson

Ultimately, and Dyson knew this, it was all about solving the problem, damnation down the road not being a factor. Individuals, groups, teams, and even large corporations can become obsessed with solving the problem, oblivious to the consequences. Few ponder moral, ethical, or even financial consequences at the moment. It is best to consider a few examples, but there are thousands.

 Obsession. We know, of course, about Thomas Edison, who between 1878 and 1880 tried at least three thousand filament possibilities to bring the light bulb into existence. Steve Jobs had a pure obsession, driving his teams to the maximum, to develop his Apple computer. The large team at Los Alamos worked tirelessly to develop various components of the A-Bomb, though flying high above was a chorus of distinguished voices** warning of the possible consequences. Ford Motors became obsessed with building the EV, only later to discover it was an unwanted child of innovation – at the cost of billions. The entire European continent remains obsessed with EVs, and now faces a possible future of foreign dependency as well as dealing with mountains of highly toxic, heavy, and useless old lithium batteries. 

The latest obsession is ongoing and all around us. It concerns AI and Autonomous Weapons.  The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to the creation of autonomous weapons, which can make decisions and engage targets without human intervention. The danger is easy to see as the deployment of such weapons raises ethical and security concerns, including the potential for unintended escalation in conflicts, loss of human control over lethal decisions, and the risk of AI-driven warfare becoming uncontrollable. The obsession with AI-driven military superiority could lead to a new arms race with unpredictable, dangerous, and even unknowable consequences.

Though less dangerous, AI and algorithms are responsible for much trading on the stock markets. A bit of news comes out, which is read instantly by AI indicating a level of risk. Then the algorithms execute huge trades and within a few minutes of the news, the market can drop hundreds of points. This single example illustrates the pure obsession of hundreds of corporations to harness AI to a spectrum of ends, many financial, but many with unknown long-term consequences.

Conclusion. Historically, problem-solving obsession can lead to the greatest good or the most horrific ends. Nonetheless, because obsession opens every mental channel to the task of a single problem, it is often a necessary factor for solving big problems. Obsession is the ultimate form of getting involved. Both Thoreau and Dyson make valid points about the negative aspects of toys, but both missed the nature and dominion of obsession in bringing them to reality. However, there’s no doubt (to me) that both spent some time in a state of obsession, the handmaiden of genius.  As a word of caution, obsession has a dangerous aspect. It can take over your entire being, never to release you, even if you solve the problem. In that way, it can become addictive because it creates a cycle of reward, compulsion, and reinforcement that mirrors the mechanisms of substance addiction – right down to the release of dopamine. You may be familiar with the dopamine release experienced by long-distance runners – another type of obsession. You become emotionally and cognitively attached to the obsessive mindset, leading to a loss of control and negative consequences in your life. The literature contains an extensive body of work on the addiction-from-obsession factor. In brief, sometimes you need obsession, but you don’t want it to take up permanent residence.

*Freeman Dyson, Disturbing the Universe, 1979. (Columbia). Freeman John Dyson (1923-2020), FRS, was a British-American theoretical physicist and mathematician known for his work in quantum field theory, mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics, condensed matter physics, nuclear physics, and engineering.

** This chorus was directed by Albert Einstein, who even wrote a letter to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt urging him to cancel the Manhattan (A-Bomb) Project. Note that Einstein himself probably became obsessive through his thought experiments to develop relativity theory. 

©2024, G Donald Allen

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more