What to Do About AI in Colleges?

What to Do About AI in Colleges?

There is a growing perception among students that ChatGPT can answer any question they have. This feeling extends to young professionals as well. Faculty must address this significant issue, perhaps even more urgently than traditional political problems. Let’s explore this further.

Mathematics

With the advent of tools like Maple and Mathematica*, students quickly realized these tools could solve many well-defined problems. These specialized AI tools are continually improving. Students understand this but accept that they must learn the techniques to pass their courses.

Engineering

Until recently, AI did not perform well on some engineering exams, but its capabilities are improving. Despite this, students believe AI will be available when needed in the future. As with math classes, students still comply and learn the material.

Practical Application

What students often fail to see is that in practice, problems are not simply presented; they must be created from underlying situations with contingencies. Students need to see examples of this by working through complex situations where they must formulate a problem-solving strategy. AI does not yet do this.

Writing

At many colleges, students are not required to take a composition course; instead, writing courses are taught according to department-specific criteria. This is unfortunate. However, AI can assist here. For example, you can supply a draft of your written work to ChatGPT and ask it to rewrite it. You might find it smooths out your writing, cleans up the grammar, and reorganizes the material better. I regularly use this feature, and it is helpful. These Large Language Models (LLMs) are totally impressive.

Softer Sciences

In the softer sciences, students are often assigned topics or papers. What’s to prevent students from simply asking AI to compose a paper on the topic? AI has such a vast information base that it often generates papers beyond the scope of most students. The question is: Why shouldn’t students use these AI tools, at least to get started? The significant disadvantage is that they never learn to assemble disparate information sources into a coherent and consistent product. They never learn where to look or how to gather information. What can be done? Students must now be confronted with situations where they must create a problem to be solved and then write about it. This should become the principal part of the assignment. AI cannot do this — yet (I think).

Verification

You cannot check the output for AI intervention. For example, one can easily switch between AI tools, asking for multiple rewrites. This makes it difficult to verify originality.

This is just a brief introduction to the problems AI brings to learning, and they may not be receiving the attention they need. AI is changing everything. Students also need to learn what AI cannot do and base their lifelong learning on this new reality.

*Maple and Mathematica are specialized software tools that do symbolic mathematics, statistics, and high-level programming. They are essential tools for many scientists and mathematicians.

P.S. This version is the AI-generated rewrite of my original rough draft.

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I. I. Introduction. Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II. ...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

The principles we use but don't know it. 1. Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

The Lemming Instinct

In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

First Blog

Search This Blog