Skip to main content

AI in the courtroom. Yes?

AI in the Courtroom 

Our question today is whether AI results can be used in the courtroom. There are at least four major issues pending. If you recall, it was used, but not credited, in a recent case, but it cited non existent sources. But still AI is everywhere, and lawyers use it rabidly. But can you cite it in the courtroom, as an expert source? Here is a brief run down of the issues. They are complex and important. 

The use of AI for expert testimony in a courtroom is a topic of ongoing debate and consideration within the legal community. While AI technologies can provide valuable insights and analysis in various fields, including law, there are several factors to consider when discussing their use in courtrooms:

  1. Reliability and Accuracy: AI systems can provide analyses based on large datasets and algorithms, but their reliability and accuracy can vary depending on the quality of the data and the design of the algorithms. Courts typically require expert testimony to be reliable and based on sound scientific principles.

  2. Transparency and Interpretability: AI systems often work as "black boxes," meaning it can be challenging to understand how they arrive at their conclusions. This lack of transparency can be a significant hurdle in legal proceedings, where transparency and the ability to challenge evidence are essential principles.

  3. Legal and Ethical Considerations: There are legal and ethical considerations regarding the use of AI in legal proceedings, including concerns about bias, privacy, and the potential for misuse. Courts must carefully consider these factors when deciding whether to admit AI-generated evidence.

  4. Admissibility: The admissibility of AI-generated evidence in courtrooms can vary depending on jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. Courts may consider factors such as the reliability of the technology, the qualifications of the individuals who developed or used the technology, and the relevance of the evidence to the case at hand.

Overall, while AI technologies have the potential to assist legal professionals and provide valuable insights, their use for expert testimony in courtrooms raises complex legal, ethical, and practical considerations that must be carefully evaluated. As technology continues to evolve, it's likely that these issues will continue to be the subject of debate and discussion within the legal community.

P.S. AI assisted this report in identifying the principal issues.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03
Post a Comment
Read more

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view
Post a Comment
Read more