Skip to main content

AI in the courtroom. Yes?

AI in the Courtroom 

Our question today is whether AI results can be used in the courtroom. There are at least four major issues pending. If you recall, it was used, but not credited, in a recent case, but it cited non existent sources. But still AI is everywhere, and lawyers use it rabidly. But can you cite it in the courtroom, as an expert source? Here is a brief run down of the issues. They are complex and important. 

The use of AI for expert testimony in a courtroom is a topic of ongoing debate and consideration within the legal community. While AI technologies can provide valuable insights and analysis in various fields, including law, there are several factors to consider when discussing their use in courtrooms:

  1. Reliability and Accuracy: AI systems can provide analyses based on large datasets and algorithms, but their reliability and accuracy can vary depending on the quality of the data and the design of the algorithms. Courts typically require expert testimony to be reliable and based on sound scientific principles.

  2. Transparency and Interpretability: AI systems often work as "black boxes," meaning it can be challenging to understand how they arrive at their conclusions. This lack of transparency can be a significant hurdle in legal proceedings, where transparency and the ability to challenge evidence are essential principles.

  3. Legal and Ethical Considerations: There are legal and ethical considerations regarding the use of AI in legal proceedings, including concerns about bias, privacy, and the potential for misuse. Courts must carefully consider these factors when deciding whether to admit AI-generated evidence.

  4. Admissibility: The admissibility of AI-generated evidence in courtrooms can vary depending on jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. Courts may consider factors such as the reliability of the technology, the qualifications of the individuals who developed or used the technology, and the relevance of the evidence to the case at hand.

Overall, while AI technologies have the potential to assist legal professionals and provide valuable insights, their use for expert testimony in courtrooms raises complex legal, ethical, and practical considerations that must be carefully evaluated. As technology continues to evolve, it's likely that these issues will continue to be the subject of debate and discussion within the legal community.

P.S. AI assisted this report in identifying the principal issues.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 
Post a Comment
Read more

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...
Post a Comment
Read more