Skip to main content

Advice, Bad Advice, and Damned Advice

 

Advice, Bad Advice, and Damned Advice

Don Allen

 

Everyone gives advice, and almost everyone takes it now and then. Advice, though, is inherently incoherent, inconsistent, and inaccurate.  Now and then, it can be critical. But even the stingiest, coldest, or most loving of us give it freely. A glossary follows but first consider a few examples.

 

·        When you take advice, are you substituting another’s thinking for your own?

·        Sometimes I wish I followed my own advice. But nooooo! I took someone else’s advice. Wrong.

·        When you give advice and someone takes it, then are you not somewhat responsible for outcomes?

·        There have been times I rejected good advice because I didn’t like who was giving it.

·        Companies call in consultants to give advice, but the consultants seldom know the fine points of the business they are advising. People call in psychologists for the same reasons.

·        Ministers and priests are always giving advice, but usually only once a week. Moms and dads give advice, every day if you allow.

·        Schools have many professional advisors on life, but only a few have truly lived.

Glossary

Advice is a suggestion or recommendation offered by someone who should have more experience or knowledge than the person being advised. It can be given on any topic, from personal relationships to career decisions to financial matters.

 

Bad advice is any advice that is not based on sound reasoning or evidence. It can be advice that is harmful, misleading, or simply ineffective. Bad advice can come from anyone, including friends, family, celebrities, and even experts.

 

Damned advice is advice that is unhelpful, harmful, or even dangerous. It can be advice that is based on false information, outdated beliefs, or personal opinions. Damned advice can come from anyone, including friends, family, experts, and even strangers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?