Skip to main content

The Eight Stages of Understanding

The Eight Stages of Understanding.

Problem-solving is a broad category of intellectual activities. It requires knowledge of multiple sorts as outlined below. It is part of the pyramid of understanding, but a seriously important part. However, most of us can have successful careers having only problem-solving skills. Higher-order understanding is more significant in the world of theories and ideas, the meaning of solutions, and how they fit into the intellectual scheme. The list below is reminiscent of Bloom’s Taxonomy, but refined for our purposes. One of our tools for problem-solving, used by all, is at the very base. One can’t know everything, and we’re never protected from it. Thus ignorance, and how we deal with it, is in everyone’s world.

·        Ignorance:  lacking knowledge or awareness.

·        Awareness: awareness that there is something unknown or not understood.

·        Knowledge: acquisition of factual information and concepts related to the subject.

·        Comprehension: understanding the meaning and significance of the acquired knowledge. Reading and study fit here.

·        Application: ability to use knowledge and understanding in practical or real-world situations. Problem-solving starts here and includes the following stages.

·        Analysis: ability to break down complex ideas or information into their component parts.

·        Synthesis: ability to integrate various pieces of information, ideas, or concepts to create a new understanding or perspective.

·        Evaluation: involves critically assessing information, ideas, or arguments.

While stated in a list, the bottom half is not necessarily linear structurally. The points are developed in bits and pieces. For example, after problem-solving one may move directly to an evaluation of the solution in light of the knowledge of the subject. As we will see, problem-solving is more than just finding a solution. It is a continuing test of that knowledge as to validity and reliability.

Before continuing, let’s consider ignorance. We all have it -  about many things. What to do about solving a problem? For example, you come to a “T” on the road and don’t know which way to turn. Flipping a coin is a typical answer. You have a worker at the office who’s preoccupied with something and you know not what. You discuss matters with the worker but learn little. What to do?  Sometimes, simple patience may be the key. Call this judgment from ignorance, or a hunch, or something. But you never know. Human problems can be horrible. We can solve them sometimes but never know why.

On the other hand, by the time our children are raised, we can reflect on our experience and integrate how its various components give a new and better understanding of parenting. That is, synthesis arrives. Here, the familiar maxim applies. “Parenting is the worst teacher. It gives the exam first, and then the lesson.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...