Skip to main content

The Rat and the Mouse - an AI Fable

 This fable was written by BARD.google.com. It took about 3 seconds, faster the Aesop. Try it and see for yourself the sheer power of AI. This fable was created with the command "Write a fable based on the rat and the mouse." Create stories for your kids, or yourself.

The Rat and the Mouse

Once upon a time, there was a rat who lived in a big city. He had everything he could ever want: plenty of food, a warm place to sleep, and lots of friends. But one day, the rat got bored. He decided to leave the city and explore the countryside.

The rat traveled for many days until he came to a small village. He was tired and hungry, so he decided to look for food. He found a barn and snuck inside. The barn was full of hay and grain, and the rat was soon feasting.

As the rat was eating, he heard a noise. He turned around and saw a mouse. The mouse was small and scared, and the rat could tell that it was lost.

The rat felt sorry for the mouse, so he invited it to join him for dinner. The mouse was grateful, and the two of them quickly became friends.

The rat and the mouse spent the next few days exploring the countryside together. They had many adventures, and they learned a lot about each other.

One day, the rat and the mouse came to a river. The river was wide and fast-moving, and the rat knew that the mouse would not be able to cross it alone.

The rat decided to help the mouse across the river. He picked up the mouse in his mouth and swam across the river.

The mouse was so grateful to the rat for saving its life. The two of them continued to be friends for many years, and they always looked out for each other.

Moral of the story: True friends are always there for each other, no matter what.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...