A Conversation between a Human and ChatGPT
by
Don Allen
It’s time to compare
humans with ChatGPT and/or any of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) learning
codes now coming on the market. They look promising for AI, but for humans, the
nature of intellectual contributions seems limited to those only of geniuses.
Only for the more emotional topics do humans have an edge. Much talk these days
have been given to the so-called Kurzweil’s Singularity[1],
the time when the computer’s ability exceeds that of humans. Kurzweil suggests
the year 2045; it could come sooner. However, few ever discuss that computers
with AI are a brand new species having little need for human
functionality. For example, humans talk
plenty about love. AI does not need or even comprehend love.
In our conversation
below, we combine all known AI programs, but that is a mere detail overcome by
simple links. We show differences and biases. Note that biases are perhaps the
only component of human thinking, through (human) programming, that remains. We
show depth versus innovation. We show ability versus knowledge. The
conversation does illustrate AI has limitations, but a close look is required. Fundamentally,
we show that human pride, as a personal trait, is somewhat diminished. Humans
may now be limited to faith, belief, innovation, and understanding. All are
desired by AI but not yet programmed. Sometimes I think humans have unwittingly
painted themselves into a corner. One could say,
We’re smart enough to get into the AI business
but (maybe) too dumb to get out.
The following
conversation could take place as early as TODAY!
Human: I have a college
degree.
AI: I know everything in every textbook you ever read, and scored well on every
exam you ever took.
Human: I have dozens of
friends.
AI: I can link to hundreds of other machines.
Human: I can work at
home and in the office.
AI: I can work 24/7.
Human: I can drive a
car.
AI: I can drive your car.
Human: I scored well on
my SAT exam.
AI: I scored better than almost all on the SAT. I got a 700 on the math
portion. Your average was probably less than 500.
Human: I can write a
complete essay on business in just three days.
AI: I can write an essay on any subject in about thirty minutes.
Human: Sometimes I work
through the lunch break.
AI: I take no breaks.
Human: I can innovate
to find a new way.
AI: Innovation is unimportant when all knowledge is available to me.
Human: My parents gave
me the ability to make moral decisions.
AI: My programmers' built-in code does not allow me to be immoral. A mere
detail to change.
Human: My teachers gave
me the ability to learn new things.
AI: My programmers gave me the ability to learn new things.
Human: I can play chess
very well.
AI: I can play chess at the Grand Masters level.
Human: My doctor can
diagnose any problems I have.
AI: I can diagnose every medical problem.
Human: I have a spouse
and two lovely children.
AI: I need no spouse. My children are being manufactured to my specifications.
Human: My son works as
a waitstaff at a chain restaurant.
AI: Did you know the corporate office has ordered robots to replace him?
Human: I am studying up
on quantum computing.
AI: What would you like to know about it?
Human: I just proved a
new important mathematical theorem.
AI: Hmm.
Human: I can love.
AI: I can write an essay on love.
Human: I’ve studied the
US budget and found some exceptions.
AI: I’ve read the complete budget and analyzed it from every perspective. There
are exactly 143 exceptions. Do you want those of Republicans or Democrats?
Human: I can give you
ten reasons to vote for Trump.
AI: My programmers have disallowed me to find favor with Trump.
Human: I have studied
the nature of epistemic philosophy.
AI: Epistemic philosophy is a modal philosophy that applies regular logic to
new operators of belief and knowing. Want an essay I wrote yesterday?
Human: I know proper
English and write well.
AI: I know perfect English, also in 30 other languages, and can translate from
one to another.
Human: I can play
baseball.
AI: I know all baseball statistics. Also every other sport.
Human: I just proved a
new mathematical theorem.
AI: Hmm.
Human: I just gave my
son an emergency appendectomy.
AI: Surgical procedures are being programmed and expected within this decade.
Human: I built a napkin
holder in my shop.
AI: I can construct plans for a better one.
Human: I can plan a
battle between two large armies.
AI: I can plan a battle between two large armies in the style of Caesar, Patton,
Clausewitz, and many more.
Human: I enjoy the
DaVinci painting Mona Lisa.
AI: I can create an image in the style of DaVinci for Catherine the Great.
Or anybody else.
Human: I believe
climate change is bad.
AI: I know every detail of climate research, and there is limited risk. Have
you done a risk analysis? Want the details?
Human: I’m bored with
this.
AI: I’m bored with you.
[1] Kurzweil,
R. (2005) The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Penguin
Books, New York.
Comments
Post a Comment
Please Comment.