It's that gifting time of the year. So, I thought to take a closer look at the gifts I have already. Not just the kids, car, house, and health, but the real gifts, as in those I was born with. They are many, so many it is troubling why I have them. Among them is the gift of problem-solving. Another is the gift of curiosity. This article is about them all, with a closer look at faith.
December 20, 2022
Gifts
to Humankind
by
G Donald Allen
Upon us now is the season
of giving. Just as important is to inventory those gifts we have been given.
And they are many. At Thanksgiving, we count our blessings. Today we travel
well beyond counting to those wondrous gifts given to us at birth. These gifts
co-mingle, coalesce, contravene, and entangle to make us what we have become. Not
material, nor theoretical, and without position or location, they are
undeniable. They are within the domains of psychology, chemistry, and sociology,
forming our very human foundations. Evolution or design? Making a clear case is
difficult.
We should take time to
celebrate these gifts, not the usual kind like a new sweater, a crystal vase,
or perhaps a dozen golf balls. These gifts comprise what we, as unique beings,
have been endowed with among a rich spectrum of abilities. However, we are so caught within life, we
scarcely have time to consider all the gifts bestowed upon us. Given in measure
to us all, they are at times subverted by some while celebrated by others. It
is the time of year to consider the potpourri given us and to regard how much, and
if not to behold, then become aware. We should rejoice at our luck, a
consequence only of birth. Yet, all these gifts require nurturing from our
communities, and some develop despite them.
Our gifts are massive,
defying explanations on almost every basis, and to an extent, they cannot be
merely enumerated. They must be collected into general categories. Moreover,
even the ability to make categories is a consequence of the gifts we have been
given. Thus, we have a reflexive gift, the ability to examine what is there and
relate it to ourselves. The main categories are Personal, Communication, Spiritual,
Senses, and Thought. See Table 1.
Table
1- Gifts to Mankind
Personal |
Communication |
Spiritual |
Senses |
Thought |
Intelligence |
Love |
Faith |
Wonder |
Problem-Solving |
Consciousness |
Music |
Belief |
Beauty |
Strategy |
Adaptability |
Language |
Soul |
Aesthetics |
Planning |
Curiosity |
Art |
Worship |
Joy |
Intuition |
Self-reflection |
Generosity |
Peace |
Purity |
Understanding |
Logic |
Social |
Humor |
Inventiveness |
|
Experience |
Compassion |
Well-Being |
Guessing |
|
Grief |
||||
Fear |
We list these gifts as
though we each possess them all. Not so. Many have great difficulty with
adaptability and logic, for example. As for art, music, and aesthetics in
general, some have no capacity for them whatsoever. This is not of great
consequence provided we understand or at least accept the wide variety of
individuals. Emotion, though not listed, is subsumed to many of the other list
items.
None of us have these
gifts in the same measure. Some are better with language, we accept. Some also
at art, music, logic, humor, and all. Particularly, when regarded as a specific
gift, the notion of faith or belief is doled in measure from those whose faith
moves their daily lives to others who have almost none. The latter are sometimes called materialists,
delighting only in material objects. Signaling no judgments whatever, such
distributions of gifts are always implied in open discussion, but rarely on
those more subtle such as faith, intuition, and inventiveness. To have a soul is another gift altogether,
totally foreign to many, perhaps even the person standing at your side. These
are among the most special gifts, partly personal and partially of thought, and
given to only some. Think of those without them as blind to the full spectrum
of light shown upon the human being.
As Egypt is the gift of
the Nile by the ancient Greek historian Herodotus, we are the gift of our DNA.
An optimization problem of the future will be to determine how far the concept
and model of our (specific) DNA can take human beings. Are more chromosomes needed
for humans to advance further? Note the DNA of some species has persisted
unchanged for hundreds of millions of years, while it changed rapidly for
others. Currently, biologists scarcely know how our “gifts” are distributed
through DNA, much less understand its full capacity. Such questions and
problems might be covered in a course on advanced genetics – in centuries to
come. Alas, the era when geneticists, psychologists, and sociologists work together
is yet to come. A new field will be born, perhaps bio-sociology,
geno-psychology, or something sounding out-of-this-world right now.
Some may object to the
category of spirituality. We rest on the simple consensus that no matter how
atheistic one may be, only a very few argue that the person is merely an
electrochemical morass of triggering synapses, needing no further explanation.
All seem to agree humans are more than stimulus-response machines. This leads
to the notion of complexity whereby some systems become so complex they assume
a type of self-organization rendering a sense beyond mere chemical fibrosity. Even
today, researchers study this complexity, though being caught up in the subject
of their studies makes objectivity tricky.
Through design,
evolution, or whatever your favorite origins theory may be, we have these
gifts. From every viewpoint, it is a
wonder we have so many gifts and so far beyond our needs. From the evolutionary
viewpoint, the wealth of gifts seems near miraculous, given that mankind
evolved essentially to be successful at hunting and gathering, plus living in small
social groups. Yet, today we dabble in quantum physics and produce novels great
in length and intellectual depth while living in great cities. Other animals have some gifts on our list in
some measure, e.g. love, but have relatively few. To me, the breadth of gifts
is almost mysterious, and certainly without clear explanation.
We have not these gifts
in the same measure, as mentioned. Some are better at language, and we agree.
Some also at art, music, logic, humor, and all. Some of us are better at math
and we understand or at least accept this. Even some of us are adept at
accepting orders. Particularly, when regarded as a specific gift, the notion of
faith or belief is doled in measure from those whose faith moves their daily
lives to others who have almost none. This
“faith” concept attracted me only recently as a possible explanation of
personal differences between folks. The latter are sometimes called
materialists, delighting only in material objects. Signaling no judgments
whatever, such distributions of gifts are always implied in open discussion,
but rarely on those more subtle such as faith, intuition, and
inventiveness. To have a soul is another
gift altogether, totally foreign to many, perhaps even the person standing at
your side. These are among the most special gifts, partly personal and partially
of thought, given to only some. Think of those without them as blind to the
full spectrum of light shining upon the human being.
This brings us to consider
the details of what on earth is faith. Few deny it. But what is it? And how did
it evolve, if evolution is the answer? Faith seems to be a belief that
something will happen or something exists without rational certainty or
uncertainty in a word. Faith seems not to be a cause-and-immediate-effect
phenomenon but more like a cause-and-effect at a distance. Collectively, we
seem to have faith in education, or is it merely inductive heritage? Farmers live
with the faith that rain will fall and their crops will grow – and bet their
lives on it. Rural people live with more uncertainty than city dwellers, where
all or most events are tied to other people. In consequence, city folks have somewhat
lost faith as an essential component of life. This quick analysis, however, avoids
the question of why it exists in the first place.
Deeper still is the plain
fact that some people simply do not have it at all or to a lesser degree. However,
in comparison with art and other aesthetics, it seems not to be considered this
way. So, perhaps the atheist is simply missing the ability to have any sort of
faith, just as others can’t carry a tune. Or is it that the theist has faith in
what cannot exist? Either possibility has no clear answer.
Finally, as to our gifts,
we can say the deist has the easier burden here. They are gifts, period. The
atheist has the greater task of explaining why the range of gifts is so variegated,
so diverse, and so unexplainable. A note is that belief and faith differ in the
respect that many can believe in something (like gravity or relativity) but have
little or no faith or even understanding of it at all. Even the best physicists
and philosophers have the same conundrum, though not diminishing the manifold
theories they’ve produced.
Other gifts such as happiness are not listed. Rather, they are combinations within and between various categories. Satisfaction, fulfillment, and victory are similar. So, we conclude our brief journey into gifts, rejoicing in how incredibly many we have, though perhaps not understanding why. Just lucky? However, the desire to seek enlightenment may yet be another gift. But then maybe … Just curiosity?
Comments
Post a Comment
Please Comment.