Skip to main content

Your Brain Within Your Brain

 

Your Bicameral Brain
by

Don Allen

Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword?

You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused.

But maybe you didn’t forget.  Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use.

Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of the most important thinking tools we’ve been given.

When you go to the other room and ask yourself what you wanted, the word is not there. It never was. Your mind, with its bicameral functionality, didn’t ever give you the word. I have this condition in another way. I can recognize a face distinctly, or a smell, but my brain will simply not give me the name or word. Others can smell almost anything, and then give the name immediately.

Think of two people in a room, both of which don’t know the other is there, and yet communicate.

Communication within your bicameral brain occurs but is not uniform across segments. This accounts for that flash in insight that disappears without a trace as quickly as it came. It could be where our intuition lives. As well, innovation and insight must come from somewhere, but where? We have it; it’s always at work; it appears from nowhere; it gives information if we care to listen; it leaves without a trace.

This may be how other “intelligent” animals think,  in a cloud of nonverbal thought, but most deliberatively. The wolf knows where to hunt, where to turn, what to do, with never a word. The lion pride hunts as a group with a clear strategy, again with never a word. With never a word, sentence, or paragraph, full thoughts are possible without language.

After most of this was written, it became more and more familiar until I remembered reading the book by Julian Jaines, written in 1976, The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Jaines argues that before words there was no consciousness. Indeed, research in the 1990s using brain imaging technology, Jaines work has received renewed attention. Our small effort tries to illustrate that the unconscious brain still resides within us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view