Skip to main content

The Geometry of Thought

It is sometimes better to think in terms of the shape of knowledge and thought in terms of geometry. This renders many geometric metaphors. They help us to categorize and understand how we understand, in a visual way. A few examples come to mind.

 

·        You often think in terms of some knowledge encompassing a topic – you’ve got it covered from all perspectives.

·        You may think of some topics as disjoint from or orthogonal to other knowledge.

·        You may see your knowledge triangulates a topic allowing you to narrow it down to some essential facts.

·        Your point of reference is distant from hers.

·        You square up the situation, understanding all questions and a proper and complete perspective.

·        You may see someone's train of thought is parallel to yours, proceeding along similar lines, but noting no intersection is possible.

·        You may think of the best possible thinking is the best or fastest way to move from one position to an objective – a hypotenuse.

·        You have found the intersection of your approach and your opponent’s.

·        The base of the candidate’s knowledge does not measure up to the job requirements.

·        You may think of your knowledge about a topic forms a sphere of all possibilities.

·        For some very complex topics, you may think in terms of higher or infinite dimensionality of knowledge, realizing the unboundedness of complexity.

·        You intend to “circle back” to make a response to an issue you don’t know currently.

·        You have an acute sense of a situation indicating a perceptive understanding or insight.

·        Your employer has the highest degree of understanding of their competition.

·        Often you think of knowledge values as coordinates of a possible set of information needed.

·        After some deliberation, the ambassador concluded his views to be congruent with those of his neighboring state.

·        On another tack, we often hear of fuzziness of thought and knowledge. We don’t know it precisely, but in some fuzzy way. Not blurry. Not random.  Note there is an entire area of math referred to as fuzzy.

 

Now, this all this because you know some geometry and begin to classify or arrange knowledge in geometrical terms for convenience? For descriptiveness? By cleverness? By transparency?


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more