Skip to main content

The Geometry of Thought

It is sometimes better to think in terms of the shape of knowledge and thought in terms of geometry. This renders many geometric metaphors. They help us to categorize and understand how we understand, in a visual way. A few examples come to mind.

 

·        You often think in terms of some knowledge encompassing a topic – you’ve got it covered from all perspectives.

·        You may think of some topics as disjoint from or orthogonal to other knowledge.

·        You may see your knowledge triangulates a topic allowing you to narrow it down to some essential facts.

·        Your point of reference is distant from hers.

·        You square up the situation, understanding all questions and a proper and complete perspective.

·        You may see someone's train of thought is parallel to yours, proceeding along similar lines, but noting no intersection is possible.

·        You may think of the best possible thinking is the best or fastest way to move from one position to an objective – a hypotenuse.

·        You have found the intersection of your approach and your opponent’s.

·        The base of the candidate’s knowledge does not measure up to the job requirements.

·        You may think of your knowledge about a topic forms a sphere of all possibilities.

·        For some very complex topics, you may think in terms of higher or infinite dimensionality of knowledge, realizing the unboundedness of complexity.

·        You intend to “circle back” to make a response to an issue you don’t know currently.

·        You have an acute sense of a situation indicating a perceptive understanding or insight.

·        Your employer has the highest degree of understanding of their competition.

·        Often you think of knowledge values as coordinates of a possible set of information needed.

·        After some deliberation, the ambassador concluded his views to be congruent with those of his neighboring state.

·        On another tack, we often hear of fuzziness of thought and knowledge. We don’t know it precisely, but in some fuzzy way. Not blurry. Not random.  Note there is an entire area of math referred to as fuzzy.

 

Now, this all this because you know some geometry and begin to classify or arrange knowledge in geometrical terms for convenience? For descriptiveness? By cleverness? By transparency?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view