Skip to main content

The Geometry of Thought

It is sometimes better to think in terms of the shape of knowledge and thought in terms of geometry. This renders many geometric metaphors. They help us to categorize and understand how we understand, in a visual way. A few examples come to mind.

 

·        You often think in terms of some knowledge encompassing a topic – you’ve got it covered from all perspectives.

·        You may think of some topics as disjoint from or orthogonal to other knowledge.

·        You may see your knowledge triangulates a topic allowing you to narrow it down to some essential facts.

·        Your point of reference is distant from hers.

·        You square up the situation, understanding all questions and a proper and complete perspective.

·        You may see someone's train of thought is parallel to yours, proceeding along similar lines, but noting no intersection is possible.

·        You may think of the best possible thinking is the best or fastest way to move from one position to an objective – a hypotenuse.

·        You have found the intersection of your approach and your opponent’s.

·        The base of the candidate’s knowledge does not measure up to the job requirements.

·        You may think of your knowledge about a topic forms a sphere of all possibilities.

·        For some very complex topics, you may think in terms of higher or infinite dimensionality of knowledge, realizing the unboundedness of complexity.

·        You intend to “circle back” to make a response to an issue you don’t know currently.

·        You have an acute sense of a situation indicating a perceptive understanding or insight.

·        Your employer has the highest degree of understanding of their competition.

·        Often you think of knowledge values as coordinates of a possible set of information needed.

·        After some deliberation, the ambassador concluded his views to be congruent with those of his neighboring state.

·        On another tack, we often hear of fuzziness of thought and knowledge. We don’t know it precisely, but in some fuzzy way. Not blurry. Not random.  Note there is an entire area of math referred to as fuzzy.

 

Now, this all this because you know some geometry and begin to classify or arrange knowledge in geometrical terms for convenience? For descriptiveness? By cleverness? By transparency?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...