Skip to main content

How We Do It

Not aliens. Not animals. Only us humans.  We do operate at all levels from the primitive to the high intellectual.  All of us, with the same brains, do similar things and in similar ways. But the organization changes are the requirements change.  The early tribes needed some rules to follow, plus many taboos about danger. The great modern civilizations also need rules to be sure but more than that, they need theories and beyond.  We assemble the bunch of them into a hierarchy of organizational traits or operational containers.

This outline is not about epistemology or even ontology, topics having precise but different meanings.  This is about doing, assembling, understanding, and realizing. It is about multiple categories that mix up, contradict, conflict, and reject. You can have a taboo but reject and confirm it on the same day. These categories can be individual, yet commonplace, tribal, and societal.  

·        Skills – how to hunt, farm, marry, fish, protect, vigilance, etc

·        Taboos  

o   To do not

o   To eat not

o   To forbid

·        Ritual

o   Incantations

o   Rights of passage

o   Holy books, scripture

o   Emotions

o   Beliefs

·        Methods

o   Hunting/fishing/farming

o   Construction

o   Comprehensive schemes

o   Random

o   Programmed

·        Rules

o   Regulations

o   Policy

o   Procedures

o   Steps to follow

o   Social

o   Games

·        Models

o   General and robust, allowing testing, Ptolemy vs. Newton

o   Scientific

o   Political

o   Social

o   Logical

·        Visions

o   Hopes

o   Dreams

o   Ideas

o   Inspiration

o   Innovation

o   Pre-analytic cognitive acts* such as intuitions

·        Theories –

o   Opinion,

o   Pre-theoretical

o   Explanatory

o   Comprehensive with or without models

o   Axiom-based

o   Fact-based

o   Fuzzy, stochastic, random

o   Rigorous/logical

·        Laws –

o   Canon

o   Legal

o   Universally accepted

o   Propositional

*Thomas Sowell, A Conflict of Visions, 1987.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view