Theory and Conclusion

What are the differences between theory and conclusion?

At first blush, this seems a simple question. But not quite. Eventually some conclusions fail, but theories do as well.

A theory is a “framework” to explain certain phenomena. It contains premises or axioms, and basic conclusions about what may be true, what may happen, and the like. Conclusions are basically what follows from the basic theory. When accepted, they become a part of the theory. Therefore, the theory evolves and grows. Examples include all the sciences, math, and even psychology.

It can happen there become multiple theories that begin with assumptions but diverge into different theories. These include sociology, economics, and even psychology.

Unstated here is just how conclusions are formed. In sciences, there are experiments, observations, and derivations. However, in religion, there are these but also revelations to be accepted upon belief. In advanced science, constructs are formed for which no experiments or observations can be made, but remarkably observable predictions are made. Example, M-theory, theory of everything.

Unstated as well, is the logic allowed in drawing conclusions. Logic itself evolves. For example, theorems in mathematics formerly considered as correct have required modification and/or correction. Ditto for the other sciences.

It is best to think of theory and conclusions as organic, emerging and evolving as other theories emerge and evolve. Sorry, there are no absolutes anywhere in this story, as much as we want them.

Example. Consider the simple bacterium. It began before Pasteur as a theoretical possibility, replacing malaise theories. Then a theory emerged. Insufficient to explain all diseases, the virus was discovered, and the theory was expanded. Only three-four decades ago, the prion was hypothesized and it explained diseases neither bacteria nor viruses could explain, such as mad cow disease. So, it is natural to ask, what might be discovered next? Every discovery is posited as the end of the story, but turns out to be the beginning of a new story with theories, conclusions, and then eventual failure.

On another note, even now black holes have been shown to “leak.” How to explain this? Yes, there are theories evolving - not yet final. On yet another note, theories of time and whether it has a direction seem always to be in a formative stage.

Think of it this way. You’ve heard of the stone age, the bronze age, the iron age, the industrial age, and more. You’ve heard of the information age, and think we’re here. In fact, we are in the age of theories, where you must have a theory to get into any game. And theories are easy to produce, but many don’t stick.

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I. I. Introduction. Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II. ...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

The principles we use but don't know it. 1. Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

The Lemming Instinct

In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

First Blog

Search This Blog