Skip to main content

Moral Shortcuts

 

Moral shortcuts.  Moral shortcuts are aphorisms that sum up states of goodness in only a few words. They are instant retorts, reports, or pronouncements given without explanation and analysis. They appeal to feeling good, hardly saying why, without content, and without depth. They are words meant to resonate in the mind.  They are weak, often vague aphorisms.  Moral shortcuts live a saltshaker to be spread to give flavor!   Beware of empty politicians telling us …

A.      It is the right thing to do.

B.      This is not who we are.

C.      We are on the right side of history.

D.     We have formed a commission to study the issue.

E.      We’re here to help you.

F.       They are friends, not competitors.

G.     Let us reimagine … .

Some buy every time, nodding in agreement. Some ask, “Is this the best you can do?”

Ala, morality is in the air, often attached to extreme measures, sort of an essential sweetener to a distasteful medicine. Really, they want to convince us, “It’s the morality, stupid!”

Raw meat (aka students) comes from the warmer ovens of high school, marches into the pressure cookers of college, and emerges having been infected by this new disease of instant morality. Then comes life, where conflicts and contradictions pummel these helpless children.

Recall …  “Fool me once, shame on me, but fool me twice, shame on you.” Damn, Abe Lincoln was right. You can fool some of the people all the time. Just sprinkle morality all over it.

------------------------------------

If you need the F-word to mane your point, you have no point to make. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?