Skip to main content

Testing the Test

 

Testing Features. We are constantly taking tests, giving them, or reading about them.  Let’s get the outcomes straight. That is, let’s learn the testing buzzwords.  In this way, you’ll know what to look for when somebody proposes a test for something, or gives you some test results.  For example, COVID-19 testing is replete with hidden meanings and outcomes.

·        Sensitivity: Ability to test correctly for the disease (or whatever).

·        Specificity: Ability to test correctly for no disease (or whatever).

From these we have

·        True positive: the test is positive for disease and disease is present.

·        True negative: the test is positive for no disease and no disease is present.

·        False-positive: the test is positive but no disease is present.

·        False-negative: the test is negative but the disease is present.

 

·        Validity: test measures what it is supposed to test. There are at least five types of validity:

o   Face validity refers not to what the test measures, but what the test ‘appears to measure’

o   Content validity tests concordant and consistent with the curriculum

o   Concurrent: test agrees with other test performance

o   Factorial validity: the extent of correlation of the different factors with the whole test.

·        Predictability: test predicts certain future outcomes, another type of validity.

Thus, some tests can valid but not predictive. For example, a test too difficult for all so that all fail.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more