Skip to main content

Was Einstein a Genius?



It is almost foolish to speculate on why or how someone like Albert Einstein was a genius.  People like Einstein and Newton are essentially off the scale of human intelligence.  Yet, they live among us, make very human errors, and act in very human ways. So, we take them for humans, albeit just really smart specimens.

 As to Einstein, he told us his formula for discovery. That was through the thought experiment, wherein he would conceive of a physical situation such as what would happen as he looked in a mirror as both were accelerating toward the speed of light. This was, for Einstein, the beginning of relativity.  But what for you and I, had we been given this experiment? The implication is that Einstein dwelled on the problem endlessly until some ideas emerged.  Then, by sheer strength of will he managed those ideas into the beginnings of a theory.  Finally, it became a fait de complet.

What is not mentioned is that Einstein also had an intense proclivity to independently figure out every single step in derivations of all he knew.  For him, it was not enough to read on it and then solve problems at the chapter’s end. Don’t be fooled by stories of Einstein being a slow learner.  He knew most of calculus before most of us had our first date.  It was his depth of investigation that allowed him to penetrate his experiments to fully developed conclusions. This seems to be a characteristic of most great scientists, the compulsion to understand at the level back to the origin. 

For example, Richard Feynman tells us he would derive everything he encountered, copying into notebooks.  Newton was no doubt similar if we understand how he approached economic and monetary theory when he became master of the mint.  Huge notebooks of information were compiled. And this was long after he was already world-famous.

Einstein persisted with such thought experiments throughout his life, confounding the newer quantum theorists/geniuses, with whom he profoundly disagreed.  Such experiments and unexcelled depth,  combined with remarkable persistence and determination, together with a deep knowledge of his subject, plus a terrific mind made this genius.  Not an easy formula to mimic.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more