Skip to main content

How Does the Genius Think?

The short answer is, “Who knows. Ask one.” However, there are markers I’ve noticed over many years having worked with and read about a few of them.
a. Finding the “genius” solution is more than just picking up the right pebble on the beach. It is rejecting what doesn’t work. Researching a topic means sifting and winnowing idea after idea. The genius can reject the bad ideas quickly and move on. There is an anecdote about John von Neumann, who worked on the “Super,” H-bomb, and with the military. The report is that some engineers were working on a project for months, and one day handed it to von Neumann. He rifled through the pages for a few minutes, looked up and said it wouldn’t work. After months more of work, the engineers concluded, it doesn’t work. This is legend to the point that, “If Johnny says it will work or not, that is it.” BTW, Von Neumann was considered the best mathematician of the 20th century. Johnny had a great memory and one night at a party he got into an argument with a Byzantine scholar over some arcane facts of that time. When checked, Johnny was correct.
b. The genius, because of mental speed, can determine what needs to be done, while us mortals do what we can do. They don’t waste their time filling in gaps; they move forward to where the subject should be. Their finely honed intuition, based on vast knowledge, tells this to their inner eye. Never under estimate the power of intuition. This was the mark of Einstein, who using thought experiments, considered events scarcely imagined by conventional physicists.
c. The genius is relentless, focusing hours, days, and even years on the single purpose of their goal. Said Newton, “I focus on a topic completely until I see clear through it.” Geniuses have a capacity for work absent in most of us. Later in life Newton indicated he no longer could manage the rigor of thought he had during his greatest discoveries. Total concentration to the point of losing consciousness altogether is an asset they all possess. Archimedes of Syracuse, greatest of the ancients, was so focused on solving a problem, he was killed by a soldier when ordered to move.
Very rare is the genius that can spaz out the solution to a big problem. Geniuses have very deep knowledge, and read all materials.
Most geniuses pay attention to origins, and derive independently almost everything including that known. Example. Richard Feynman was famous for his notebooks and thoroughness of understanding everything he could. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/...

Teaching an Ant How to Read

You have a goal; teach an ant, (sugar ant, fire ant, army ant, any one of them) how to read.   Here are some tips: 1.       First, get its attention. 2.       Show it some examples of reading sources. 3.       Read to the ant, pointing out the words as you go along. 4.       Point to specific words, pronouncing them clearly. 5.       Explain the alphabet, and discuss how words are formed.             The net result for all your careful effort is the ant doesn’t learn a thing.   The obvious reason is that it hasn’t the “brain-power” to learn reading.    Moreover, it isn’t interested even with your infinite patience. It can’t distinguish your sounds.   In short it simply can’t comprehend what you are doing.   Its brain is not wired for learning written and spoken languag...

Can a good argument be made with a bad premise?

Can a good argument be made with a bad premise? Yes. This is done all the time. Not so much in science because all the practitioners know the premises and are not easily deceived. It is a part of their training. You will find the most excellent arguments made upon bad premises* in politics, political speech, and social communication. Sometimes, bad premises are the basis of demagoguery, to incite, to pass legislation, to go to war. Sometimes, we all make great arguments to others, though with an error in the premises. Now, let’s look for a moment at the many types of bad premises. 1.      Wishful thinking, or you just hope it is so, or you think it should be so. These are deadly to the listener and the speaker. Both parties are deceived. 2.      Expressly for deception. Lawyers make their livings this way with their interpretations of the statues or perhaps what a witness has said. 3.      Vagueness is a leading cause...