Skip to main content

THE NEXT PANDEMIC


The next pandemic will be population saturation.

The current world population is 7.7 billion.  Experts have estimated the maximum population the world can sustain is in the 9-10 billion range. This is population saturation, i.e. this is the largest sustainable population possible over time – barring disastrous conditions.   The current population growth is slightly greater than 1.0% annually. A simple calculation shows that the world population will reach the 9 billion mark before 2046 and the 10 billion mark by 2100.  These dates are therefore very close at hand.

For high populations, as we have right now, a few implications seem obvious.

  • High population implies viruses and bacteria may rapidly spread globally. The spread of COVID-19 is but one example.  The annual flu season which claims many more lives is another. Massive homelessness everywhere and an African decline of pesticide usage is bringing back Hepatitis C, Malaria, and TB, now drug resistant*. The challenges to medicine will be enormous. Proximity supports contagion. 
  • High population makes the food supply unstable in the event of crop failures. Crop failures do occur all the time, but the world will need to be alert to these and compensate from banks of nutrition.  
  • High population implies crowding, which leads to social interactive problems. Too much crowding leads to unusual and mostly not understood behavior of a given local population.
  • High population density requires rigid controls for health and food management. Requirements for sewage, air handling, and sanitary needs will drastically increase throughout large cities. Social distancing may become commonplace.  
  • Rolling starvation will be reported regionally. Small droughts will cause small starvations and human skirmishes; large droughts will cause lots of both, the skirmishes becoming wars.


A saturated population implies regional famines and diseases annually.  A saturated population implies educational systems will be overwhelmed. A saturated population indicates probable violent conflicts (wars) for resources such as water and arable land – like early in mankind’s history.

Therefore, the world will become even more global in the sense of wide governmental controls of food, fuel, air, and therefore wide social requirements and behavior.  Those seeking more control wish their population to increase to the critical level where a more egalitarian society is unsustainable if not impossible. We see this in China. With a population of 1.4 billion, very strict social regulations are not only important but essential for basic human management.  We see this as well in Europe, though the declining Caucasian population has allowed an increased immigrant population if only to satisfy needed labor levels. We are seeing this in the US with a strong political contingent insisting on open borders and welcoming uneducated masses to bulk up the population toward the same end.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Infinity of Theories

I do love the Stock Markets, all of them.   Why?   Because of the abundance of theories.    Every day, no matter how the market moves there are dozens of pundits offering forth their theory as to why it went down – or up, where it’s going tomorrow or next week, and why it must crash soon or maybe elevate another couple thousand more points.   Ok, this is fine.   But the next day these same folks may expound theories postulating the opposite.   This proves market pundits have no essential understanding of economics as related to the market.   This proves pundits prefer expedience to understanding.   I am constantly besieged by brokerage firms telling me if I would only invest a million, they would help me reach my goals.   If I had this information, how to make a lot of money, I would borrow every cent I could and apply it to making a bunch of money.   I’d not tell a soul. So, why are they trying to help me?   Well, ...