Skip to main content

THE NEXT PANDEMIC


The next pandemic will be population saturation.

The current world population is 7.7 billion.  Experts have estimated the maximum population the world can sustain is in the 9-10 billion range. This is population saturation, i.e. this is the largest sustainable population possible over time – barring disastrous conditions.   The current population growth is slightly greater than 1.0% annually. A simple calculation shows that the world population will reach the 9 billion mark before 2046 and the 10 billion mark by 2100.  These dates are therefore very close at hand.

For high populations, as we have right now, a few implications seem obvious.

  • High population implies viruses and bacteria may rapidly spread globally. The spread of COVID-19 is but one example.  The annual flu season which claims many more lives is another. Massive homelessness everywhere and an African decline of pesticide usage is bringing back Hepatitis C, Malaria, and TB, now drug resistant*. The challenges to medicine will be enormous. Proximity supports contagion. 
  • High population makes the food supply unstable in the event of crop failures. Crop failures do occur all the time, but the world will need to be alert to these and compensate from banks of nutrition.  
  • High population implies crowding, which leads to social interactive problems. Too much crowding leads to unusual and mostly not understood behavior of a given local population.
  • High population density requires rigid controls for health and food management. Requirements for sewage, air handling, and sanitary needs will drastically increase throughout large cities. Social distancing may become commonplace.  
  • Rolling starvation will be reported regionally. Small droughts will cause small starvations and human skirmishes; large droughts will cause lots of both, the skirmishes becoming wars.


A saturated population implies regional famines and diseases annually.  A saturated population implies educational systems will be overwhelmed. A saturated population indicates probable violent conflicts (wars) for resources such as water and arable land – like early in mankind’s history.

Therefore, the world will become even more global in the sense of wide governmental controls of food, fuel, air, and therefore wide social requirements and behavior.  Those seeking more control wish their population to increase to the critical level where a more egalitarian society is unsustainable if not impossible. We see this in China. With a population of 1.4 billion, very strict social regulations are not only important but essential for basic human management.  We see this as well in Europe, though the declining Caucasian population has allowed an increased immigrant population if only to satisfy needed labor levels. We are seeing this in the US with a strong political contingent insisting on open borders and welcoming uneducated masses to bulk up the population toward the same end.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view