THE NEXT PANDEMIC

The next pandemic will be population saturation.

The current world population is 7.7 billion. Experts have estimated the maximum population the world can sustain is in the 9-10 billion range. This is population saturation, i.e. this is the largest sustainable population possible over time – barring disastrous conditions. The current population growth is slightly greater than 1.0% annually. A simple calculation shows that the world population will reach the 9 billion mark before 2046 and the 10 billion mark by 2100. These dates are therefore very close at hand.

For high populations, as we have right now, a few implications seem obvious.

High population implies viruses and bacteria may rapidly spread globally. The spread of COVID-19 is but one example. The annual flu season which claims many more lives is another. Massive homelessness everywhere and an African decline of pesticide usage is bringing back Hepatitis C, Malaria, and TB, now drug resistant*. The challenges to medicine will be enormous. Proximity supports contagion.
High population makes the food supply unstable in the event of crop failures. Crop failures do occur all the time, but the world will need to be alert to these and compensate from banks of nutrition.
High population implies crowding, which leads to social interactive problems. Too much crowding leads to unusual and mostly not understood behavior of a given local population.
High population density requires rigid controls for health and food management. Requirements for sewage, air handling, and sanitary needs will drastically increase throughout large cities. Social distancing may become commonplace.
Rolling starvation will be reported regionally. Small droughts will cause small starvations and human skirmishes; large droughts will cause lots of both, the skirmishes becoming wars.

A saturated population implies regional famines and diseases annually. A saturated population implies educational systems will be overwhelmed. A saturated population indicates probable violent conflicts (wars) for resources such as water and arable land – like early in mankind’s history.

Therefore, the world will become even more global in the sense of wide governmental controls of food, fuel, air, and therefore wide social requirements and behavior. Those seeking more control wish their population to increase to the critical level where a more egalitarian society is unsustainable if not impossible. We see this in China. With a population of 1.4 billion, very strict social regulations are not only important but essential for basic human management. We see this as well in Europe, though the declining Caucasian population has allowed an increased immigrant population if only to satisfy needed labor levels. We are seeing this in the US with a strong political contingent insisting on open borders and welcoming uneducated masses to bulk up the population toward the same end.

*https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/4/3/98-0308_article

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I. I. Introduction. Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II. ...

The Lemming Instinct

In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

The principles we use but don't know it. 1. Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

First Blog

Search This Blog