Skip to main content

THINGS TO COME - Corona-wise


Peering Through the Corona Looking Glass

The coronavirus will catalyze changes in society. It will cause future suspicion, caution, and fear of contagion. (We do not yet know if there are carriers of this disease. Compare Typhoid Mary.) There is more, mostly about life-style and government operations. The use of masks and gowns will become widespread, at least for a while. The elderly will be more careful; nursing homes will require medical tests prior to admission.  Hospital will require tests as well, with new patients possibly quarantined on their day of admission.  These provisions you would expect.  There are more, and they apply to all.

  • Many students, now forced to stay at home to study, may never return, preferring another career direction for their lives.
  • New employees will be given thorough medical exams.
  • Many companies will discover that many of their functions are better served by workers at home, thus saving office costs. Supervision issues will be solved.
  • A new emphasis on households having a rainy day fund will enjoy a new popularity.
  • Many people will learn nose-to-nose dependency on social contact is critically important.
  • At least one country has learned that a virus infusion combined with military aggression is a possible operational strategy. This gives biological warfare a new slant.
  • National borders may return.
  • Family vacations will be planned far more cautiously.
  • Frequent TV ads for hand washing, brushing teeth, daily showers, and general proper hygiene will become common. (This was popular decades ago.)
  • Schools and employers will re-emphasize proper cleanliness.
  • Every municipality will have an active health officer issuing frequent health alerts. Restaurants will be monitored more closely than ever with newer and more stringent health requirements.
  • We may see a de-emphasis of political ideologies in favor of health and safety of citizens.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view