Skip to main content

CAN WRITE - CAN'T READ


FUTURE SPEAK

“I can write but I can’t read.” Who could ever say that?  In fact, much of what you read today is generated by such entities.   Huh?

You need a couple of active, commercially available products in wide application today.  Both are a part of NLP – Natural Language Processing.  The first is

NLG – Natural Language Generation.  This is an outflow from AI (Artificial Intelligence) that can generate text from data (with templates and bias if you want). It is almost undetectable as machine generated, makes sense, and can be generated at the rate of thousands of pages per second.  It is used by news organizations, corporations, Investment firms, accounting firms, and the like.  It can be and probably is used by political parties to generate manifold texts for wide distribution.  Input is data, headline texts, and articles. It is nearly grammatically perfect.

NLU – Natural Language Understanding.  Also, it is an application of AI. You Alexa uses this already.  You ask, “Tell me a joke about horses,” and it first interprets what you want and then generally finds one in vast data bases of jokes.  This is somewhat different from the query, “Tell me an original joke about horses.” The solution to such an inquiry is well underway.
We will see in the years ahead, (a) the end of traditional journalism, (b) student compositions ordered online, (c) political activism movements operated by a single person in the parent’s basement, and (d) business bids generated in seconds.

BTW, did you know the Chinese have complete avatar-type newscasters that read the news. Google it.* This means AI can generate the news and the avatar reads it.  It looks completely human, but ain’t. YES, totally fake news.

*https://www.theguardian.com/technology/video/2018/nov/09/worlds-first-ai-presenter-unveiled-in-china-video

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more