Skip to main content

From the Coronavirus to God



“There is no problem the mind of man can set that the mind of man cannot solve.”
Samuel Johnson


If you recall this quote, it may be from the 1946 Sherlock Holmes movie, “Dressed to Kill” starring Basil Rathbone.  It does make you think, but it also gives you hope. It gives hope we can solve anything we come across.  It gives hope we can ultimately answer every question – though some may take more time than others.


Unfortunately, Dr. Johnson was wrong. 

The problem here is that from the work of mathematicians, particularly Kurt Gödel (1906-1978), we see there are true propositions that cannot be proved, and can never be proved, true. Many have already been discovered.  It seems almost paradoxical that we can prove them unprovable, but cannot not prove them.  The implication is that problem can be set and then found can never be proved. Such problems are beyond unknown unknowns, they are undecidable.  In other language, we can with a slight linguistic stretch prove there will be Black Swan events, but we cannot prove what they will be.

In today’s Coronavirus event, we find a middle ground for this.  We can agree that a disease will present that will rock the world, but we can never predict the disease itself, the time it occurs, or where it will arise.


In terms of computing we can say a problem is decidable if we can construct a Turing machine which will halt in finite amount of time for every input and give answer as ‘yes’ or ‘no’. A problem is undecidable if this is not so. And there are many such problems.


It is simple to say that Samuel Johnson was wrong.  Lots of important people have been wrong but remain luminaries in our world. But in a deeper meaning, it indicates we may have one day two entirely different fully compatible explanations of the universe but will never be able to determine which, if either, is correct.  Being more theosophical, we may never be able to decide whether or not there is a God, maintaining the ages-old feeling it is a matter of faith. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...